Effect of a Remotely Delivered Self-directed Behavioral Intervention on Body Weight and Physical Health Status Among Adults With Obesity

Author:

Hoerster Katherine D.123,Hunter-Merrill Rachel1,Nguyen Tanya1,Rise Peter1,Barón Anna E.4,McDowell Jennifer1,Donovan Lucas M.15,Gleason Emily1,Lane Amber1,Plumley Robert1,Schooler Mary1,Schuttner Linnaea16,Collins Margaret1,Au David H.16,Ma Jun7

Affiliation:

1. VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle Division, Health Services Research and Development, Seattle, Washington

2. VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle Division, Mental Health Service, Seattle, Washington

3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle

4. Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora

5. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle

6. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle

7. Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago

Abstract

ImportanceThe effectiveness of remotely delivered, self-directed, weight loss programs in routine clinical practice is largely unknown.ObjectiveTo test whether a self-directed, remotely administered behavioral lifestyle intervention improves weight and self-reported general health status compared with usual care.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this randomized clinical trial, 511 adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or more and less than 45 (based on electronic health record [EHR] weight and height), were enrolled from 30 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) sites between February 15, 2018, and December 18, 2018 (final follow-up February 18, 2021).InterventionsParticipants were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n = 254) or the control group (n = 257). Both received usual care. Participants randomized to the intervention received Diabetes Prevention Program–based self-directed videos, handouts, and coaching messages via an online platform or US mail for 12 months.Main Outcomes and MeasuresCoprimary outcomes were weight measured in primary care and recorded in the EHR and self-reported general health status using the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical component score (PCS; higher scores are better [range, 0-100]) at the 12-month follow-up. The between-group minimal clinically important differences are 3 kg for weight and 5 points for the SF-12 PCS. Linear mixed models used weights and SF-12 PCS measured at either time point, with participants analyzed according to randomization assignment. Statistical significance for each coprimary outcome was based on a 2-sided α level of .025.ResultsAmong 511 participants randomized (mean age, 57.4 [SD, 13.9] years; 231 female [45%]), 429 (84.0%) had EHR-based weights and 410 (80.2%) had SF-12 PCS data at 12 months. The unadjusted mean weight at 12 months declined from 102.7 kg to 99.8 kg in the intervention group compared with 101.9 kg to 101.0 kg in the control group (adjusted between-group mean difference, −1.93 [97.5% CI, −3.24 to −0.61]; P = .001). At 12 months, the unadjusted mean SF-12 PCS scores declined from 44.8 to 44.3 among intervention participants compared with 44.5 to 43.2 among control participants (adjusted between-group mean difference, intervention minus control, 0.69 [97.5% CI, −1.11 to 2.49]; P = .39). Cardiovascular events represented the highest percentage of serious adverse events, accounting for 25% of events in the intervention group and 35% in the control group.Conclusions and RelevanceAmong adults with obesity, a remotely delivered self-directed, behavioral lifestyle intervention, compared with usual care, resulted in statistically significantly greater weight loss at 12 months, although the difference was not clinically important. There was no significant difference in self-reported general physical health status at 12 months.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03260140

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3