Operative Hysteroscopy vs Vacuum Aspiration for Incomplete Spontaneous Abortion

Author:

Huchon Cyrille123,Drioueche Hocine4,Koskas Martin25,Agostini Aubert6,Bauville Estelle7,Bourdel Nicolas8,Fernandez Hervé910,Fritel Xavier11,Graesslin Olivier12,Legendre Guillaume13,Lucot Jean-Philippe14,Panel Pierre15,Raiffort Cyril16,Giraudet Géraldine14,Bussières Laurence17,Fauconnier Arnaud23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, APHP, Hopital Lariboisière, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France

2. Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Unité de Recherche 7285, Risques Cliniques et Sécurité en Santé des Femmes et en Santé Périnatale (RISCQ), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France

3. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHI Poissy-St-Germain, Poissy CEDEX, France

4. Department of Clinical Research, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France

5. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, APHP, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France

6. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hôpital La Conception, Marseille CEDEX 5, France

7. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes CEDEX 2, France

8. Department of Gynecologic Surgery, CHU Estaing Clermont Ferrand, 63058 Clermont Ferrand CEDEX 1, Faculty of Medicine, ISIT – Université d’Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France

9. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, AP-HP, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, 94270, France

10. Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health-INSERM U1018, Université Paris Sud, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France

11. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHU de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Faculté de Médecine et Pharmacie, Inserm CIC1402, Poitiers, France

12. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hôpital Alix de Champagne, CHU de Reims, Reims, France

13. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHU d’Angers, Angers CEDEX 01, France

14. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France

15. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France

16. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, APHP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Département Hospitalier Universitaire Risque et Grossesse, Colombes, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France

17. Clinical Unit Research/Clinic Investigation Center, Paris Descartes, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Abstract

ImportanceVacuum aspiration is commonly used to remove retained products of conception in patients with incomplete spontaneous abortion. Scarring of the uterine cavity may occur, potentially impairing future fertility. A procedural alternative, operative hysteroscopy, has gained popularity with a presumption of better future fertility.ObjectiveTo assess the superiority of hysteroscopy to vacuum aspiration for subsequent pregnancy in patients with incomplete spontaneous abortion who intend to have future pregnancy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe HY-PER randomized, controlled, single-blind trial included 574 patients between November 6, 2014, and May 3, 2017, with a 2-year duration of follow-up. This multicenter trial recruited patients in 15 French hospitals. Individuals aged 18 to 44 years and planned for surgery for an incomplete spontaneous abortion with plans to subsequently conceive were randomized in a 1:1 ratio.InterventionsSurgical treatment by hysteroscopy (n = 288) or vacuum aspiration (n = 286).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was a pregnancy of at least 22 weeks’ duration during 2-year follow-up.ResultsThe intention-to-treat analyses included 563 women (mean [SD] age, 32.6 [5.4] years). All aspiration procedures were completed. The hysteroscopic procedure could not be completed for 19 patients (7%), 18 of which were converted to vacuum aspiration (8 with inability to completely resect, 7 with insufficient visualization, 2 with anesthetic complications that required a shortened procedure, 1 with equipment failure). One hysteroscopy failed due to a false passage during cervical dilatation. During the 2-year follow-up, 177 patients (62.8%) in the hysteroscopy group and 190 (67.6%) in the vacuum aspiration (control) group achieved the primary outcome (difference, −4.8% [95% CI, −13% to 3.0%]; P = .23). The time-to-event analyses showed no statistically significant difference between groups for the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.07]). Duration of surgery and hospitalization were significantly longer for hysteroscopy. Rates of new miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies, Clavien-Dindo surgical complications of grade 3 or above (requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention or life-threatening event or death), and reinterventions to remove remaining products of conception did not differ between groups.Conclusions and RelevanceSurgical management by hysteroscopy of incomplete spontaneous abortions in patients intending to conceive again was not associated with more subsequent births or a better safety profile than vacuum aspiration. Moreover, operative hysteroscopy was not feasible in all cases.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02201732

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3