The FDA in the Crosshairs—Science, Politics, and Abortion-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

The FDA in the Crosshairs—Science, Politics, and Abortion

Published:2024-04-16 Issue:15 Volume:331 Page:1269
ISSN:0098-7484
Container-title:JAMA
language:en
Short-container-title:JAMA

Author:

Fernandez Lynch Holly¹,Kesselheim Aaron S.²

Affiliation:

1. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

2. Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

In this Viewpoint, the Supreme Court case FDA v AHM is used to illustrate the tension the FDA faces between science and politics, and state authority over abortion vs federal authority over which drugs may be marketed nationwide.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Link

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2816668/jama_fernandez_lynch_2024_vp_240017_1712256162.804.pdf

Reference6 articles.

1. Court intrusion into science and medicine: the mifepristone decisions.;Aaron;JAMA,2023

2. Mifepristone, preemption, and public health federalism.;Zettler;J Law Biosci,2022

3. The limits of acceptable political influence over the FDA.;Fernandez Lynch;Nat Med,2021

4. The Supreme Court’s abortion exceptionalism—judicial deference, medical science, and mifepristone access.;Fox;N Engl J Med,2021

5. FDA and Chevron Deference.;Bendicksen;Food Drug Law Institute,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP