Sigh Ventilation in Patients With Trauma

Author:

Albert Richard K.1,Jurkovich Gregory J.2,Connett John3,Helgeson Erika S.3,Keniston Angela1,Voelker Helen3,Lindberg Sarah3,Proper Jennifer L.3,Bochicchio Grant4,Stein Deborah M.5,Cain Christian5,Tesoriero Ron5,Brown Carlos V. R.6,Davis James7,Napolitano Lena8,Carver Thomas9,Cipolle Mark10,Cardenas Luis11,Minei Joseph12,Nirula Raminder13,Doucet Jay14,Miller Preston R.15,Johnson Jeffrey16,Inaba Kenji17,Kao Lillian18

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora

2. Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis

3. Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

4. Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, St Louis, Missouri

5. Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore

6. Department of Surgery, University of Texas, Austin

7. Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Fresno

8. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

9. Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

10. Department of Surgery, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

11. Department of Surgery, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, Delaware

12. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas

13. Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City

14. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego

15. Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

16. Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan

17. Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Los Angeles County

18. Department of Surgery, University of Texas, Houston

Abstract

ImportanceAmong patients receiving mechanical ventilation, tidal volumes with each breath are often constant or similar. This may lead to ventilator-induced lung injury by altering or depleting surfactant. The role of sigh breaths in reducing ventilator-induced lung injury among trauma patients at risk of poor outcomes is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine whether adding sigh breaths improves clinical outcomes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA pragmatic, randomized trial of sigh breaths plus usual care conducted from 2016 to 2022 with 28-day follow-up in 15 academic trauma centers in the US. Inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years, mechanical ventilation because of trauma for less than 24 hours, 1 or more of 5 risk factors for developing acute respiratory distress syndrome, expected duration of ventilation longer than 24 hours, and predicted survival longer than 48 hours.InterventionsSigh volumes producing plateau pressures of 35 cm H2O (or 40 cm H2O for inpatients with body mass indexes >35) delivered once every 6 minutes. Usual care was defined as the patient’s physician(s) treating the patient as they wished.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was ventilator-free days. Prespecified secondary outcomes included all-cause 28-day mortality.ResultsOf 5753 patients screened, 524 were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 43.9 [19.2] years; 394 [75.2%] were male). The median ventilator-free days was 18.4 (IQR, 7.0-25.2) in patients randomized to sighs and 16.1 (IQR, 1.1-24.4) in those receiving usual care alone (P = .08). The unadjusted mean difference in ventilator-free days between groups was 1.9 days (95% CI, 0.1 to 3.6) and the prespecified adjusted mean difference was 1.4 days (95% CI, −0.2 to 3.0). For the prespecified secondary outcome, patients randomized to sighs had 28-day mortality of 11.6% (30/259) vs 17.6% (46/261) in those receiving usual care (P = .05). No differences were observed in nonfatal adverse events comparing patients with sighs (80/259 [30.9%]) vs those without (80/261 [30.7%]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn a pragmatic, randomized trial among trauma patients receiving mechanical ventilation with risk factors for developing acute respiratory distress syndrome, the addition of sigh breaths did not significantly increase ventilator-free days. Prespecified secondary outcome data suggest that sighs are well-tolerated and may improve clinical outcomes.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02582957

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3