Assessment of Safety of a Fully Implanted Endovascular Brain-Computer Interface for Severe Paralysis in 4 Patients

Author:

Mitchell Peter1,Lee Sarah C. M.2,Yoo Peter E.3,Morokoff Andrew4,Sharma Rahul P.5,Williams Daryl L.6,MacIsaac Christopher7,Howard Mark E.8,Irving Lou9,Vrljic Ivan1,Williams Cameron10,Bush Steven10,Balabanski Anna H.101112,Drummond Katharine J.13,Desmond Patricia1,Weber Douglas14,Denison Timothy15,Mathers Susan2,O’Brien Terence J.101617,Mocco J.18,Grayden David B.19,Liebeskind David S.20,Opie Nicholas L.2122,Oxley Thomas J.321,Campbell Bruce C. V.1011

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia

2. Neurology, Calvary Healthcare Bethlehem, Parkdale, Australia

3. Synchron Inc, New York, New York

4. Parkville Neurosurgery, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia

5. Stanford Healthcare Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California

6. Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia

7. Intensive Care Department, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia

8. Victorian Respiratory Support Service, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia

9. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

10. Department of Neurology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia

11. Melbourne Brain Centre, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia

12. Department of Neuroscience, Alfred Brain, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia

13. Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia

14. Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

15. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

16. Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia

17. Department of Neuroscience, The Central Clinical School, Monash University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia

18. Department of Neurosurgery, Klingenstein Clinical Center, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York

19. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

20. UCLA Comprehensive Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles

21. Vascular Bionics Laboratory, Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

22. Synchron, Carlton, Australia

Abstract

ImportanceBrain-computer interface (BCI) implants have previously required craniotomy to deliver penetrating or surface electrodes to the brain. Whether a minimally invasive endovascular technique to deliver recording electrodes through the jugular vein to superior sagittal sinus is safe and feasible is unknown.ObjectiveTo assess the safety of an endovascular BCI and feasibility of using the system to control a computer by thought.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe Stentrode With Thought-Controlled Digital Switch (SWITCH) study, a single-center, prospective, first in-human study, evaluated 5 patients with severe bilateral upper-limb paralysis, with a follow-up of 12 months. From a referred sample, 4 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and 1 with primary lateral sclerosis met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Surgical procedures and follow-up visits were performed at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia. Training sessions were performed at patients’ homes and at a university clinic. The study start date was May 27, 2019, and final follow-up was completed January 9, 2022.InterventionsRecording devices were delivered via catheter and connected to subcutaneous electronic units. Devices communicated wirelessly to an external device for personal computer control.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary safety end point was device-related serious adverse events resulting in death or permanent increased disability. Secondary end points were blood vessel occlusion and device migration. Exploratory end points were signal fidelity and stability over 12 months, number of distinct commands created by neuronal activity, and use of system for digital device control.ResultsOf 4 patients included in analyses, all were male, and the mean (SD) age was 61 (17) years. Patients with preserved motor cortex activity and suitable venous anatomy were implanted. Each completed 12-month follow-up with no serious adverse events and no vessel occlusion or device migration. Mean (SD) signal bandwidth was 233 (16) Hz and was stable throughout study in all 4 patients (SD range across all sessions, 7-32 Hz). At least 5 attempted movement types were decoded offline, and each patient successfully controlled a computer with the BCI.Conclusions and RelevanceEndovascular access to the sensorimotor cortex is an alternative to placing BCI electrodes in or on the dura by open-brain surgery. These final safety and feasibility data from the first in-human SWITCH study indicate that it is possible to record neural signals from a blood vessel. The favorable safety profile could promote wider and more rapid translation of BCI to people with paralysis.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03834857

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3