Association of Endovascular Thrombectomy vs Medical Management With Functional and Safety Outcomes in Patients Treated Beyond 24 Hours of Last Known Well

Author:

Sarraj Amrou12,Kleinig Timothy J.3,Hassan Ameer E.4,Portela Pere Cardona5,Ortega-Gutierrez Santiago6,Abraham Michael G.7,Manning Nathan W.8,Siegler James E.9,Goyal Nitin10,Maali Laith7,Blackburn Spiros11,Wu Teddy Y.12,Blasco Jordi13,Renú Arturu13,Sangha Navdeep S.14,Arenillas Juan F.15,McCullough-Hicks Margy E.16,Wallace Adam17,Gibson Daniel17,Pujara Deep K.1,Shaker Faris11,de Lera Alfonso Mercedes15,Olivé-Gadea Marta18,Farooqui Mudassir19,Vivanco Suarez Juan S.19,Iezzi Zachary9,Khalife Jane9,Lechtenberg Colleen G.7,Qadri Syed K.20,Moussa Rami B.1,Abdulrazzak Mohammad A.21,Almaghrabi Tareq S.22,Mir Osman23,Beharry James24,Krishnaiah Balaji10,Miller Megan25,Khalil Najwa25,Sharma Gagan J.2426,Katsanos Aristeidis H.27,Fadhil Ali12,Duncan Kelsey R.12,Hu Yin28,Martin-Schild Sheryl B.29,Tsivgoulis Georgios K.30,Cordato Dennis25,Furlan Anthony12,Churilov Leonid31,Mitchell Peter J.32,Arthur Adam S.33,Parsons Mark W.25,Grotta James C.34,Sitton Clark W.35,Ribo Marc18,Albers Gregory W.36,Campbell Bruce C. V.24

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio

2. Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio

3. Department of Neurology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

4. Department of Neurology, Valley Baptist Medical Center, Harlingen, Texas

5. Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain

6. Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City

7. Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City

8. Department of Neurosurgery, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

9. Department of Neurology, Cooper Neurological Institute, Camden, New Jersey

10. Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis

11. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston

12. Department of Neurology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand

13. Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

14. Department of Neurology, Stroke and Telestroke, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, California

15. Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario – University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

16. Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis

17. Department of Neurointerventional Surgery, Ascension Wisconsin, Milwaukee

18. Department of Neurology, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain

19. Neurointerventional Research Lab, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City

20. Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston

21. Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

22. Department of Neurology, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia

23. Department of Neurology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas

24. Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

25. Department of Neurology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

26. Department of Neurology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

27. Department of Neurology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

28. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

29. Department of Neurology, Touro Infirmary and New Orleans East Hospital, New Orleans, Louisiana

30. Second Department of Neurology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece

31. Department of Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

32. Department of Radiology, NeuroIntervention Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

33. Department of Neurosurgery, Semmes Murphey Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee

34. Department of Neurology, Memorial Hermann Hospital – Texas Medical Center, Houston

35. Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston

36. Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, California

Abstract

ImportanceThe role of endovascular thrombectomy is uncertain for patients presenting beyond 24 hours of the time they were last known well.ObjectiveTo evaluate functional and safety outcomes for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) vs medical management in patients with large-vessel occlusion beyond 24 hours of last known well.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective observational cohort study enrolled patients between July 2012 and December 2021 at 17 centers across the United States, Spain, Australia, and New Zealand. Eligible patients had occlusions in the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery (M1 or M2 segment) and were treated with EVT or medical management beyond 24 hours of last known well.InterventionsEndovascular thrombectomy or medical management (control).Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2). Mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) were safety outcomes. Propensity score (PS)–weighted multivariable logistic regression analyses were adjusted for prespecified clinical characteristics, perfusion parameters, and/or Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) and were repeated in subsequent 1:1 PS-matched cohorts.ResultsOf 301 patients (median [IQR] age, 69 years [59-81]; 149 female), 185 patients (61%) received EVT and 116 (39%) received medical management. In adjusted analyses, EVT was associated with better functional independence (38% vs control, 10%; inverse probability treatment weighting adjusted odds ratio [IPTW aOR], 4.56; 95% CI, 2.28-9.09; P < .001) despite increased odds of sICH (10.1% for EVT vs 1.7% for control; IPTW aOR, 10.65; 95% CI, 2.19-51.69; P = .003). This association persisted after PS-based matching on (1) clinical characteristics and ASPECTS (EVT, 35%, vs control, 19%; aOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.02-9.72; P = .047); (2) clinical characteristics and perfusion parameters (EVT, 35%, vs control, 17%; aOR, 4.17; 95% CI, 1.15-15.17; P = .03); and (3) clinical characteristics, ASPECTS, and perfusion parameters (EVT, 45%, vs control, 21%; aOR, 4.39; 95% CI, 1.04-18.53; P = .04). Patients receiving EVT had lower odds of mortality (26%) compared with those in the control group (41%; IPTW aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.89; P = .02).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study of treatment beyond 24 hours of last known well, EVT was associated with higher odds of functional independence compared with medical management, with consistent results obtained in PS-matched subpopulations and patients with presence of mismatch, despite increased odds of sICH. Our findings support EVT feasibility in selected patients beyond 24 hours. Prospective studies are warranted for confirmation.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3