Integrated Clinical-Molecular Classification of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Author:

Katipally Rohan R.1,Martinez Carlos A.1,Pugh Siân A.2,Bridgewater John A.3,Primrose John N.4,Domingo Enric5,Maughan Timothy S.6,Talamonti Mark S.7,Posner Mitchell C.8,Weichselbaum Ralph R.1,Pitroda Sean P.1,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

2. Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom

3. UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom

4. Department of Surgery, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, United Kingdom

5. Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom

6. MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom

7. Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois

8. Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

Abstract

ImportancePersonalized treatment approaches for patients with oligometastatic colorectal liver metastases are critically needed. We previously defined 3 biologically distinct molecular subtypes of colorectal liver metastases: (1) canonical, (2) immune, and (3) stromal.ObjectiveTo independently validate these molecular subtypes in the phase 3 New EPOC randomized clinical trial.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective secondary analysis of the phase 3 New EPOC randomized clinical trial included a bi-institutional discovery cohort and multi-institutional validation cohort. The discovery cohort comprised patients who underwent hepatic resection for limited colorectal liver metastases (98% received perioperative chemotherapy) from May 31, 1994, to August 14, 2012. The validation cohort comprised patients who underwent hepatic resection for liver metastases with perioperative chemotherapy (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan based) with or without cetuximab from February 26, 2007, to November 1, 2012. Data were analyzed from January 18 to December 10, 2021.InterventionsResected metastases underwent RNA sequencing and microRNA (miRNA) profiling in the discovery cohort and messenger RNA and miRNA profiling with microarray in the validation cohort.Main Outcomes and MeasuresA 31-feature (24 messenger RNAs and 7 miRNAs) neural network classifier was trained to predict molecular subtypes in the discovery cohort and applied to the validation cohort. Integrated clinical-molecular risk groups were designated based on molecular subtypes and the clinical risk score. The unique biological phenotype of each molecular subtype was validated using gene set enrichment analyses and immune deconvolution. The primary clinical end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 240 patients were included (mean [range] age, 63.0 [56.3-68.0] years; 151 [63%] male), with 93 in the discovery cohort and 147 in the validation cohort. In the validation cohort, 73 (50%), 28 (19%), and 46 (31%) patients were classified as having canonical, immune, and stromal metastases, respectively. The biological phenotype of each subtype was concordant with the discovery cohort. The immune subtype (best prognosis) demonstrated 5-year PFS of 43% (95% CI, 25%-60%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20-0.68) and OS of 63% (95% CI, 40%-79%; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.86), which was statistically significantly higher than the canonical subtype (worst prognosis) at 14% (95% CI, 7%-23%) and 43% (95% CI, 32%-55%), respectively. Adding molecular subtypes to the clinical risk score improved prediction (the Gönen and Heller K for discrimination) from 0.55 (95% CI, 0.49-0.61) to 0.62 (95% CI, 0.57-0.67) for PFS and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.52-0.66) to 0.63 (95% CI, 0.56-0.70) for OS. The low-risk integrated group demonstrated 5-year PFS of 44% (95% CI, 20%-66%; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.76) and OS of 78% (95% CI, 44%-93%; HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.84), superior to the high-risk group at 16% (95% CI, 10%-24%) and 43% (95% CI, 32%-52%), respectively.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this prognostic study, biologically derived colorectal liver metastasis molecular subtypes and integrated clinical-molecular risk groups were highly prognostic. This novel molecular classification warrants further study as a possible predictive biomarker for personalized systemic treatment for colorectal liver metastases.Trial Registrationisrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN22944367

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Oncology,Cancer Research

Reference32 articles.

1. A population-based study of the incidence, management and prognosis of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.;Leporrier;Br J Surg,2006

2. Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases: a multi-institutional study of indications for resection.;Hughes;Surgery,1988

3. Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors.;Kanas;Clin Epidemiol,2012

4. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases.;Fong;Ann Surg,1999

5. Evaluation of long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multifactorial model of 929 patients.;Rees;Ann Surg,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3