Use of Single-Arm Trials for US Food and Drug Administration Drug Approval in Oncology, 2002-2021

Author:

Agrawal Sundeep1,Arora Shaily1,Amiri-Kordestani Laleh1,de Claro R. Angelo1,Fashoyin-Aje Lola1,Gormley Nicole1,Kim Tamy2,Lemery Steven1,Mehta Gautam U.1,Scott Emma C.1,Singh Harpreet1,Tang Shenghui1,Theoret Marc R.12,Pazdur Richard12,Kluetz Paul G.12,Beaver Julia A.12

Affiliation:

1. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland

2. Oncology Center of Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland

Abstract

ImportanceSingle-arm trials have allowed for transformative therapies to be made available to patients expeditiously. However, using single-arm trials to support drug approval presents several challenges that must be carefully considered.ObservationsBetween January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration granted 176 new malignant hematology and oncology indications based on single-arm trials, including 116 accelerated approvals (AAs) and 60 traditional approvals. Overall, 87 approvals (49%) were for new molecular entities or original biologics and 89 (51%) were supplemental indications. Response rate (RR) was the most common end point used to support approval in these single-arm trials (173 of 176 [98%]). Of the 116 AAs based on single-arm trials, 45 (38%) fulfilled their postmarketing requirement to verify clinical benefit, 61 (52%) are pending verification of benefit, and 10 (9%) were withdrawn from the market as of December 31, 2021. Most (56 of 61 [92%]) AAs based on single-arm trials pending verification of benefit occurred during the previous 5 years and have ongoing confirmatory trials as of December 2021.Conclusions and RelevanceSingle-arm trials have been a common development strategy to support regulatory approval as early-stage expansion cohorts with promising durable RRs have become more prevalent. In the appropriate context, single-arm trials using durable RRs can allow patients expedited access to novel therapies and will continue to serve a role in advancing drug development in oncology. However, single-arm trials have a smaller noncomparative safety data set, inability to use time-to-event end points, and other limitations that require careful consideration within the context of the disease and available therapies. The randomized clinical trial remains the preferred approach in clinical investigation.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Oncology,Cancer Research

Reference37 articles.

1. Endpoints for assessing drug activity in clinical trials.;Pazdur;Oncologist,2008

2. Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents.;Estey;Cancer Treat Rep,1986

3. Responses and toxic deaths in phase I clinical trials.;Decoster;Ann Oncol,1990

4. Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002.;Horstmann;N Engl J Med,2005

5. Trends in the risks and benefits to patients with cancer participating in phase 1 clinical trials.;Roberts;JAMA,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3