Breast Cancer Index in Premenopausal Women With Early-Stage Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

Author:

O’Regan Ruth M.1,Zhang Yi2,Fleming Gini F.3,Francis Prudence A.45678,Kammler Roswitha9,Viale Giuseppe1011,Dell’Orto Patrizia11,Lang Istvan12,Bellet Meritxell1314,Bonnefoi Herve R.1516,Tondini Carlo17,Villa Federica18,Bernardo Antonio19,Ciruelos Eva M.1420,Neven Patrick1621,Karlsson Per22,Müller Bettina23,Jochum Wolfram2425,Zaman Khalil2526,Martino Silvana2728,Geyer Charles E.2930,Jerzak Katarzyna J.31,Davidson Nancy E.3233,Coleman Robert E.343536,Ingle James N.37,van Mackelenbergh Marion T.3839,Loi Sherene4940,Colleoni Marco941,Schnabel Catherine A.2,Treuner Kai2,Regan Meredith M.42

Affiliation:

1. University of Rochester Department of Medicine, Rochester, New York

2. Biotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, California

3. The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

4. The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

5. Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia

6. St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

7. Breast Cancer Trials Australia & New Zealand, Newcastle, Australia

8. University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Newcastle, Australia

9. International Breast Cancer Study Group, ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland

10. International Breast Cancer Study Group Central Pathology Office, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy

11. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy

12. Clinexpert-Research, Budapest, Hungary

13. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

14. SOLTI Breast Cancer Research Cooperative Group, Barcelona, Spain

15. Institut Bergonie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Universite de Bordeaux, INSERM U1312, Bordeaux, France

16. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium

17. Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy

18. Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy

19. Operative Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy

20. Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

21. Gynecologic Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospitals UZ Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

22. Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

23. Chilean Cooperative Group for Oncologic Research (GOCCHI), Santiago, Chile

24. Institute of Pathology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

25. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland

26. Breast Center, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland

27. The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, California

28. SWOG Cancer Research Network, San Antonio, Texas

29. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

30. NSABP Foundation/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

31. Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

32. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington Seattle, Washington

33. ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

34. Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom

35. National Cancer Research Institute, Breast Cancer Clinical Studies Group (NCRI-BCSG), London, United Kingdom

36. The Institute for Cancer Research, The Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), London, United Kingdom

37. Mayo Clinic and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Rochester, Minnesota

38. German Breast Group, Neu Isenburg, Germany

39. University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany

40. Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne Australia

41. Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy

42. IBCSG Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

ImportanceAdjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) with oral endocrine therapy improves outcomes for premenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer but adds adverse effects. A genomic biomarker for selecting patients most likely to benefit from OFS-based treatment is lacking.ObjectiveTo assess the predictive and prognostic performance of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) for OFS benefit in premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective-retrospective translational study used all available tumor tissue samples from female patients from the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT). These individuals were randomized to receive 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen alone, tamoxifen plus OFS, or exemestane plus OFS. BCI testing was performed blinded to clinical data and outcome. The a priori hypothesis was that BCI HOXB13/IL17BR ratio (BCI[H/I])–high tumors would benefit more from OFS and high BCI portended poorer prognosis in this population. Settings spanned multiple centers internationally. Participants included premenopausal female patients with HR+ early breast cancer with specimens in the International Breast Cancer Study Group tumor repository available for RNA extraction. Data were collected from December 2003 to April 2021 and were analyzed from May 2022 to October 2022.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary end points were breast cancer–free interval (BCFI) for the predictive analysis and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) for the prognostic analyses.ResultsTumor specimens were available for 1718 of the 3047 female patients in the SOFT intention-to-treat population. The 1687 patients (98.2%) who had specimens that yielded sufficient RNA for BCI testing represented the parent trial population. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 12 (10.5-13.4) years, and 512 patients (30.3%) were younger than 40 years. Tumors were BCI(H/I)-low for 972 patients (57.6%) and BCI(H/I)-high for 715 patients (42.4%). Patients with tumors classified as BCI(H/I)-low exhibited a 12-year absolute benefit in BCFI of 11.6% from exemestane plus OFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48 [95% CI, 0.33-0.71]) and an absolute benefit of 7.3% from tamoxifen plus OFS (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.97]) relative to tamoxifen alone. In contrast, patients with BCI(H/I)-high tumors did not benefit from either exemestane plus OFS (absolute benefit, −0.4%; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.70-1.53]; P for interaction = .006) or tamoxifen plus OFS (absolute benefit, −1.2%; HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.72-1.54]; P for interaction = .11) compared with tamoxifen alone. BCI continuous index was significantly prognostic in the N0 subgroup for DRFI (n = 1110; P = .004), with 12-year DRFI of 95.9%, 90.8%, and 86.3% in BCI low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk N0 cancers, respectively.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this prospective-retrospective translational study of patients enrolled in SOFT, BCI was confirmed as prognostic in premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer. The benefit from OFS-containing adjuvant endocrine therapy was greater for patients with BCI(H/I)-low tumors than BCI(H/I)-high tumors. BCI(H/I)-low status may identify premenopausal patients who are likely to benefit from this more intensive endocrine therapy.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3