Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment for Pediatric Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Author:

Malhotra Armaan K.123,Shakil Husain123,Smith Christopher W.12,Sader Nicholas4,Ladha Karim235,Wijeysundera Duminda N.235,Singhal Ashutosh6,Kulkarni Abhaya V.37,Wilson Jefferson R.123,Witiw Christopher D.123,Nathens Avery B.38

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neurosurgery, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Division of Neurosurgery, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

5. Division of Anesthesiology, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. Division of Neurosurgery, British Columbia Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

7. Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

8. Division of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

ImportanceThe decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment for pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is challenging for clinicians and families with limited evidence quantifying existing practices. Given the lack of standardized clinical guidelines, variable practice patterns across trauma centers seem likely.ObjectiveTo evaluate the factors influencing decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment across North American trauma centers for pediatric patients with severe TBI and to quantify any existing between-center variability in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment practices.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study used data collected from 515 trauma centers through the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2017 and 2020. Pediatric patients younger than 19 years with severe TBI and a documented decision for withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment were included. Data were analyzed from January to May 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresA random intercept multilevel logistic regression model was used to quantify patient, injury, and hospital characteristics associated with the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment; the median odds ratio was used to characterize residual between-center variability. Centers were ranked by their conditional random intercepts and quartile-specific adjusted mortalities were computed.ResultsA total of 9803 children (mean [SD] age, 12.6 [5.7]; 2920 [29.8%] female) with severe TBI were identified, 1003 of whom (10.2%) had a documented decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Patient-level factors associated with an increase in likelihood of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment were young age (younger than 3 years), higher severity intracranial and extracranial injuries, and mechanism of injury related to firearms. Following adjustment for patient and hospital attributes, the median odds ratio was 1.54 (95% CI, 1.46-1.62), suggesting residual variation in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment between centers. When centers were grouped into quartiles by their propensity for withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, adjusted mortality was higher for fourth-quartile compared to first-quartile centers (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.45-1.88).Conclusions and RelevanceSeveral patient and injury factors were associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment decision-making for pediatric patients with severe TBI in this study. Variation in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment practices between trauma centers was observed after adjustment for case mix; this variation was associated with differences in risk-adjusted mortality rates. Taken together, these findings highlight the presence of inconsistent approaches to withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in children, which speaks to the need for guidelines to address this significant practice pattern variation.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Error in Table and Results;JAMA Surgery;2024-01-24

2. Limitations to Assessing Withdrawal of Care in Children;JAMA Surgery;2023-12-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3