Open Retromuscular Sugarbaker vs Keyhole Mesh Placement for Parastomal Hernia Repair

Author:

Maskal Sara M.1,Ellis Ryan C.1,Fafaj Aldo1,Costanzo Adele1,Thomas Jonah D.2,Prabhu Ajita S.1,Krpata David M.1,Beffa Lucas R. A.1,Tu Chao1,Zheng Xinyan3,Miller Benjamin T.1,Rosen Michael J.1,Petro Clayton C.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

2. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

3. Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York

Abstract

ImportanceDurable parastomal hernia repair remains elusive. There is limited evidence comparing the durability of the open retromuscular Sugarbaker and keyhole mesh configurations.ObjectiveTo determine if the open retromuscular Sugarbaker mesh placement technique would lower parastomal hernia recurrence rates.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this single-center, randomized clinical trial, 150 patients with a permanent stoma and associated parastomal hernia who were candidates for open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair were enrolled and randomized from April 2019 to April 2022 and followed up for 2 years.InterventionsFollowing intraoperative assessment to determine the feasibility of either technique, enrolled patients were randomized to receive either retromuscular Sugarbaker or keyhole synthetic mesh placement.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was parastomal hernia recurrence at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included mesh-related complications, wound complications, reoperations, as well as patient-reported pain, abdominal wall–specific quality of life, stoma-specific quality of life, and decision regret at 1 year and 2 years.ResultsA total of 150 patients were randomized, and with 91% follow-up at 2 years, there were 13 (17%) parastomal hernia recurrences in the retromuscular Sugarbaker arm and 18 (24%) in the keyhole arm (adjusted risk difference, −0.029; 95% CI, −0.17 to 0.153, and adjusted risk ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.69). There were no statistically significant differences between the Sugarbaker and keyhole groups regarding reoperations for recurrence (2 vs 7, respectively), nonhernia intra-abdominal pathology (4 vs 10, respectively), stoma necrosis (1 vs 0, respectively), mesh-related complications (4 vs 1, respectively), patient-reported pain, abdominal wall–specific quality of life, stoma-specific quality of life, and decision regret at any time point.Conclusions and RelevanceIn the setting of open parastomal hernia repair, a retromuscular Sugarbaker mesh placement technique was not superior to a keyhole configuration 2 years after repair. Further innovation is necessary to improve parastomal hernia repair outcomes.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03972553

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3