Short-Term Outcomes Following Laparoscopic vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Author:

Wang Min1,Pan Shutao1,Qin Tingting1,Xu Xiaowu2,Huang Xiaobing3,Liu Jun45,Chen Xuemin6,Zhao Wenxing7,Li Jingdong8,Liu Chen2,Li Dewei910,Liu Jianhua11,Liu Yahui12,Zhou Baoyong9,Zhu Feng1,Ji Shunrong2,Cheng He2,Li Zheng2,Li Jing3,Tang Yichen3,Peng Xuehui3,Yu Guangsheng4,Chen Weibo6,Ma Hongqin7,Xiong Yongfu8,Meng Lingyu12,Lu Pei13,Zhang Zhenxiong1,Yu Xianjun2,Zhang Hang1,Qin Renyi1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biliary–Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China

2. Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China

3. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

4. Department of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong, China

5. Department of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Shandong, China

6. Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China

7. Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China

8. Department of Pancreatico-Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Sichuan, China

9. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

10. Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Tumor Centre, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China

11. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China

12. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China

13. Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China

Abstract

ImportanceThe safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remain controversial.ObjectiveTo compare laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy performed by experienced surgeons in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a noninferiority, open-label randomized clinical trial between September 20, 2019 and March 20, 2022, at 10 hospitals in China. A total of 412 adult patients were assessed for eligibility; 200 patients with histologically confirmed or clinically diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who were eligible to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy were enrolled. Study recruitment is complete, and follow-up is ongoing. This article reports prespecified early safety results from the trial.InterventionsParticipants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either laparoscopic or open pancreaticoduodenectomy, to be performed by experienced surgeons who had already performed at least 104 laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy operations.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point is 5-year overall survival, but the data for this end point are not yet mature; thus, secondary short-term outcomes, including operative findings, complications, mortality, and oncological results are reported here. The outcomes were analyzed according to a modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol principle.ResultsAmong 412 patients for eligibility, 200 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned 1:1 to have laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy or open pancreaticoduodenectomy. The mean (SD) age was 61.3 (9.3) years, and 78 participants (39%) were female. Laparoscopic procedures had longer operative times (median [IQR], 330.0 [287.5-405.0] minutes vs 297.0 [245.0-340.0] minutes; P < .001). Patients in the laparoscopic group lost less blood than those in the open group (median [IQR], 145.0 [100.0-200.0] mL vs 200.0 [100.0-425.0] mL; P = .02). Ninety-day mortality occurred in 2 of 100 patients in the laparoscopic group and 0 of 100 patients in the open group. There was no difference in the rates of complications of the Clavien-Dindo grades III−IV (n = 17 [17.0%] vs n = 23 [23.0%]; P = .29), comprehensive complication index (median [IQR], 0.0 [0.0-22.6] vs 8.7 [0.0-26.2]; P = .79) or median (IQR) postoperative length of stay (14.0 [11.0-17.0] days vs 14.0 [12.0-18.5] days; P = .37) between the 2 groups.Conclusions and RelevanceLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume specialized institutions resulted in similar short-term outcomes compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy among patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03785743

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3