Development and Validation of the Scoring System of Appendicitis Severity 2.0
-
Published:2024-06-01
Issue:6
Volume:159
Page:642
-
ISSN:2168-6254
-
Container-title:JAMA Surgery
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JAMA Surg
Author:
Scheijmans Jochem C. G.1, Bom Wouter J.1, Ghori Umme Habiba1, van Geloven Anna A. W.2, Hannink Gerjon3, van Rossem Charles C.4, van de Wouw Lieke2, Huisman Peter M.5, van Hemert Annemiek6, Franken Rutger J.6, Oosterling Steven J.6, Rosman Camiel7, Koens Lianne8, Stoker Jaap910, Dijkgraaf Marcel G. W.1112, Boermeester Marja A.110, , Alberts F13, Bachiri S13, den Bakker MA13, Bisschops B13, Boersma E13, Bolmers MDM13, Bosman WM13, Bril H13, Buurman C13, Courrech Staal EFW13, Davids P13, Deniz RS13, Detering R13, Dijkstra BL13, Drillenburg P13, Dinaux A13, van Duijvendijk P13, van Eden WJ13, Gans S13, Gaspersz M13, van Geel AM13, Gerhards MF13, Gratama JWC13, Groenendijk I13, Hellebrekers P13, Henebiens M13, Heydari H13, in ’t Hof K13, Hoogteijling TJ13, van Ingen G13, Jensch S13, Jonker AM13, Joosten F13, Kraaijvanger N13, Kuijpers KC13, Le Large TYS13, Linzel D13, Loos MHJ13, Lopes Cardozo AMF13, Meijer-Jorna LB13, Mulder M13, Mullaart N13, Oudejans J13, Pappot T13, Peeters S13, Pleiter C13, de Roos MA13, Scheurkogel MM13, Scholten L13, Schut T13, Tiddens OWT13, Ubels S13, de Vries FEE13, Walraven LFJ13, Wiegerinck EMA13, Wiggers JK13, Witt M13, Wolfhagen N13
Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2. Department of Surgery, Tergooi Medical Center, Hilversum, the Netherlands 3. Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands 4. Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands 5. Department of Radiology, Tergooi Medical Center, Hilversum, the Netherlands 6. Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, the Netherlands 7. Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands 8. Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 9. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 10. Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 11. Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 12. Methodology, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 13. for the SAS Collaborative Group
Abstract
ImportanceWhen considering nonoperative treatment in a patient with acute appendicitis, it is crucial to accurately rule out complicated appendicitis. The Atema score, also referred to as the Scoring System of Appendicitis Severity (SAS), has been designed to differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis but has not been prospectively externally validated.ObjectiveTo externally validate the SAS and, in case of failure, to develop an improved SAS (2.0) for estimating the probability of complicated appendicitis.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective study included adult patients who underwent operations for suspected acute appendicitis at 11 hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2020 and August 2021.Main Outcomes and MeasuresAppendicitis severity was predicted according to the SAS in 795 patients and its sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for complicated appendicitis were calculated. Since the predefined targets of 95% for both were not met, the SAS 2.0 was developed using the same cohort. This clinical prediction model was developed with multivariable regression using clinical, biochemical, and imaging findings. The SAS 2.0 was externally validated in a temporal validation cohort consisting of 565 patients.ResultsIn total, 1360 patients were included, 463 of whom (34.5%) had complicated appendicitis. Validation of the SAS resulted in a sensitivity of 83.6% (95% CI, 78.8-87.6) and an NPV of 85.0% (95% CI, 80.6-88.8), meaning that the predefined targets were not achieved. Therefore, the SAS 2.0 was developed, internally validated (C statistic, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.89), and subsequently externally validated (C statistic, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.89). The SAS 2.0 was designed to calculate a patient’s individual probability of having complicated appendicitis along with a 95% CI.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, external validation of the SAS fell short in accurately distinguishing complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis. The newly developed and externally validated SAS 2.0 was able to assess an individual patient’s probability of having complicated appendicitis with high accuracy in patients with acute appendicitis. Use of this patient-specific risk assessment tool can be helpful when considering and discussing nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis with patients.
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|