Affiliation:
1. Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
3. Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
Abstract
ImportanceThe survival benefit of laparoscopic total gastrectomy combined with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSTG) for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) without invasion into the greater curvature remains uncertain.ObjectiveTo compare the long-term and short-term efficacy of LSTG (D2 + No. 10 group) and conventional laparoscopic total gastrectomy (D2 group) for patients with APGC that has not invaded the greater curvature.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this open-label, prospective randomized clinical trial, a total of 536 patients with clinical stage cT2 to 4a/N0 to 3/M0 APGC without invasion into the greater curvature were enrolled from January 2015 to October 2018. The final follow-up was on October 31, 2021. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to February 2022.InterventionsEligible patients were randomized to the D2 + No. 10 group or the D2 group.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes were 3-year overall survival (OS) and morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery.ResultsOf 526 included patients, 392 (74.5%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 60.6 (9.6) years. A total of 263 patients were included in the D2 + No. 10 group, and 263 were included in the D2 group. The 3-year DFS was 70.3% (95% CI, 64.8-75.8) for the D2 + No. 10 group and 64.3% (95% CI, 58.4-70.2; P = .11) for the D2 group, and the 3-year OS in the D2 + No. 10 group was better than that in the D2 group (75.7% [95% CI, 70.6-80.8] vs 66.5% [95% CI, 60.8-72.2]; P = .02). Multivariate analysis revealed that splenic hilar lymphadenectomy was not an independent protective factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63-1.16) or OS (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59-1.12). Stratification analysis showed that patients with advanced posterior gastric cancer in the D2 + No. 10 group had better 3-year DFS (92.9% vs 39.3%; P < .001) and OS (92.9% vs 42.9%; P < .001) than those in the D2 group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients with advanced posterior gastric cancer could have the survival benefit from No. 10 lymph node dissection (DFS: HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.46; OS: HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.52).Conclusions and RelevanceAlthough LSTG could not significantly improve the 3-year DFS of patients with APGC without invasion into the greater curvature, patients with APGC located posterior gastric wall may benefit from LSTG.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02333721
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Reference37 articles.
1. Does the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia continue to rise in the twenty-first century? a SEER database analysis.;Dubecz;J Gastrointest Surg
2. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: incidence, characteristics, and treatment strategies.;Hasegawa;Gastric Cancer,2010
3. Splenectomy in proximal gastric cancer: frequency of lymph node metastasis to the splenic hilus.;Mönig;J Surg Oncol,2001
4. Frequency of lymph node metastasis to the splenic hilus and effect of splenectomy in proximal gastric cancer.;Sasada;Anticancer Res,2009
5. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).;Japanese Gastric Cancer Association;Gastric Cancer,2017