Standard Restrictions vs Expedited Activity After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery

Author:

O’Shea Michele1,Siddiqui Nazema Y.1,Truong Tracy2,Erkanli Alaattin2,Barber Matthew D.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina

2. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina

Abstract

ImportanceRestrictions on postoperative activity following pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery are not evidence based. Nonetheless, many pelvic surgeons place lifting and activity restrictions on patients following surgery.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether expedited activity results in noninferior anatomic and symptomatic outcomes compared with standard activity restrictions after POP surgery.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis randomized noninferiority clinical trial included patients undergoing vaginal or laparoscopic apical reconstructive surgery for POP between July 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021, at a single academic tertiary referral center in Durham, North Carolina. Anatomic outcomes were assessed by masked examiners, and subjective outcomes were assessed via validated surveys, both completed at 3 months postoperatively. Patients meeting minimum physical activity criteria with at least stage II bothersome POP were eligible. A total of 218 patients were approached, of whom 123 were randomly assigned and 107 had complete outcome data and were included in the analysis.InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned to receive standard restrictions vs expedited postoperative activity instructions.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe anatomic coprimary outcome was maximum anatomic POP support loss (SLmax), which is the most distal point of pelvic organ support loss according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (noninferiority margin, 1.0 cm). The symptomatic coprimary outcome was the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI) symptom score (noninferiority margin, 34.3 points). Differences between outcomes were assessed using linear regression models controlling for baseline SLmax and POPDI, respectively.ResultsOf 123 participants randomized, 107 had complete 3-month outcome data and were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) age was 62.8 (10.1) years. At 3 months, mean (SD) SLmax was −1.7 (1.4) cm in the expedited group and −1.5 (1.4) cm in the standard group (P = .44). After adjusting for baseline SLmax, the mean maximum support loss was 0.18 cm higher within the vaginal canal in the expedited group (95% CI, −0.68 to 0.33 cm). The coprimary outcome of POPDI score was a mean (SD) 23.7 (41.8) points in the expedited group vs 25.7 (39.3) points in the standard group (P = .80). After adjusting for baseline scores, mean POPDI scores were 5.79 points lower in the expedited group (95% CI, −20.41 to 8.84).Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings demonstrate that expedited activity after prolapse surgery results in noninferior anatomic and symptomatic prolapse outcomes. It is reasonable to instruct patients undergoing minimally invasive prolapse surgery to resume physical activities ad lib postoperatively.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04329715

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Surgery

Reference28 articles.

1. Building the evidence base for postoperative and postpartum advice.;Minig;Obstet Gynecol,2009

2. Survey of postoperative activity guidelines after minimally invasive gynecologic and pelvic reconstructive surgery.;Winkelman;Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg,2020

3. Postoperative activity restrictions: any evidence?;Weir;Obstet Gynecol,2006

4. Intraabdominal pressure with pelvic floor dysfunction: do postoperative restrictions make sense?;Yamasato;J Reprod Med,2014

5. Postoperative work and activity restrictions after abdominal surgery: a systematic review.;Loor;Ann Surg,2021

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3