Cognitive Function and Variability in Antipsychotic Drug–Naive Patients With First-Episode Psychosis

Author:

Lee Maria1,Cernvall Martin2,Borg Jacqueline13,Plavén-Sigray Pontus14,Larsson Cornelia1,Erhardt Sophie5,Sellgren Carl M.15,Fatouros-Bergman Helena1,Cervenka Simon12

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden

2. Department of Medical sciences, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

3. Center for Cognitive and Computational Neuropsychiatry, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden

4. Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

5. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

ImportanceCognitive impairment contributes significantly to clinical outcome and level of function in individuals with psychotic disorders. These impairments are present already at psychosis onset at a group level; however, the question of heterogeneity in cognitive function among patients has not been systematically investigated.ObjectiveTo provide an updated quantification of cognitive impairment at psychosis onset before patients receive potentially confounding antipsychotic treatment, and to investigate variability in cognitive function compared with healthy controls.Data SourcesIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed articles were searched up to September 15, 2022.Study SelectionOriginal studies reporting data on cognitive function in antipsychotic drug–naive patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) were included.Data Extraction and SynthesisData were independently extracted by 2 researchers. Cognitive tasks were clustered according to 6 domains of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery and the domain of executive function. Random-effects model meta-analyses of mean differences and coefficient of variation ratios (CVRs) were performed, as well as meta-regressions, assessment of study quality, and publication bias.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcome measure was Hedges g for mean differences in cognition and CVR for within-group variability.ResultsFifty studies were included in the analysis with a total of 2625 individuals with FEP (mean [SD] age, 25.2 [3.6] years, 60% male; 40% female) and 2917 healthy controls (mean [SD] age, 26.0 [4.6]; 55% male; 45% female). In all cognitive domains, the FEP group displayed significant impairment compared with controls (speed of processing: Hedges g = −1.16; 95% CI, −1.35 to −0.98; verbal learning: Hedges g = −1.08; 95% CI, −1.28 to −0.88; visual learning: Hedges g = −1.05; 95% CI, −1.27 to −0.82; working memory: Hedges g = −1.04; 95% CI, −1.35 to −0.73; attention: Hedges g = −1.03; 95% CI, −1.24 to −0.82; reasoning/problem solving: Hedges g = −0.90; 95% CI, −1.12 to −0.68; executive function: Hedges g = −0.88; 95% CI, −1.07 to −0.69). Individuals with FEP also exhibited a larger variability across all domains (CVR range, 1.34-1.92).Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this systematic review and meta-analysis identified cognitive impairment in FEP before the initiation of antipsychotic treatment, with large effect sizes. The high variability within the FEP group suggests the need to identify those individuals with more severe cognitive problems who risk worse outcomes and could benefit the most from cognitive remediation.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3