Ethnoracial Risk Variation Across the Psychosis Continuum in the US

Author:

van der Ven Els1,Olino Thomas M.2,Diehl Katharina1,Nuñez Stephanie M.3,Thayer Griffin3,Bridgwater Miranda A.4,Ereshefsky Sabrina5,Musket Christie67,Lincoln Sarah Hope8,Rogers R. Tyler9,Klaunig Mallory J.4,Soohoo Emily10,DeVylder Jordan E.11,Grattan Rebecca E.12,Schiffman Jason4,Ellman Lauren M.2,Niendam Tara A.5,Anglin Deidre M.213

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

2. Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

3. Department of Psychology, The City College of New York, City University of New York, New York

4. Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine

5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento

6. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

7. VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut

8. Department of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

9. New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York

10. Department of Biological Sciences, San Jose State University, San Jose, California

11. Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York

12. School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington–Te Herenga Waka, Wellington, New Zealand

13. The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York

Abstract

ImportanceStudies suggest a higher risk of schizophrenia diagnoses in Black vs White Americans, yet a systematic investigation of disparities that include other ethnoracial groups and multiple outcomes on the psychosis continuum is lacking.ObjectiveTo identify ethnoracial risk variation in the US across 3 psychosis continuum outcomes (ie, schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, clinical high risk for psychosis [CHR-P], and psychotic symptoms [PSs] and psychotic experiences [PEs]).Data SourcesPubMed, PsycINFO and Embase were searched up to December 2022.Study SelectionObservational studies on ethnoracial differences in risk of 3 psychosis outcomes.Data Extraction and SynthesisPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Using a random-effects model, estimates for ethnoracial differences in schizophrenia and PSs/PEs were pooled and moderation by sampling and setting was determined, along with the assessment of heterogeneity and risk of bias.Main Outcomes and MeasuresRisk of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorder, CHR-P, and conversion to psychosis among CHR-P and PSs/PEs.ResultsOf 64 studies in the systematic review, 47 were included in the meta-analysis comprising 54 929 people with schizophrenia and 223 097 with data on PSs/PEs. Compared with White individuals, Black individuals had increased risk of schizophrenia (pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.07; 95% CI, 1.64-2.61) and PSs/PEs (pooled standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03-0.16), Latinx individuals had higher risk of PSs/PEs (pooled SMD, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08-0.22), and individuals classified as other ethnoracial group were at significantly higher risk of schizophrenia than White individuals (pooled OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.31-2.50). The results regarding CHR-P studies were mixed and inconsistent. Sensitivity analyses showed elevated odds of schizophrenia in Asian individuals in inpatient settings (pooled OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.19-2.84) and increased risk of PEs among Asian compared with White individuals, specifically in college samples (pooled SMD, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.02-0.29). Heterogeneity across studies was high, and there was substantial risk of bias in most studies.Conclusions and RelevanceFindings of this systematic review and meta-analysis revealed widespread ethnoracial risk variation across multiple psychosis outcomes. In addition to diagnostic, measurement, and hospital bias, systemic influences such as structural racism should be considered as drivers of ethnoracial disparities in outcomes across the psychosis continuum in the US.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3