Brand Differences in Underage Tobacco Use as Evidence for Targeted Sanctions—Reviving the Lookback-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Brand Differences in Underage Tobacco Use as Evidence for Targeted Sanctions—Reviving the Lookback

Published:2023-10-06 Issue:10 Volume:4 Page:e233463
ISSN:2689-0186
Container-title:JAMA Health Forum
language:en
Short-container-title:JAMA Health Forum

Author:

Friedman Abigail S.¹,Liber Alex C.²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

2. Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia

Abstract

This survey study uses data from the 2020-2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health to estimate brand differences in underage cigarette and cigar use in the US.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Link

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/articlepdf/2810205/friedman_2023_ld_230025_1696364775.74843.pdf

Reference6 articles.

1. Do local Tobacco-21 laws reduce smoking among 18 to 20 year-olds?;Friedman;Nicotine Tob Res,2020

2. Tobacco 21 adoption decreased sales of cigarette brands purchased by young people: a translation of population health survey data to gain insight into market data for policy analysis.;Liber;Tob Control,2022

3. Still ‘cool’: tobacco industry responds to state-wide menthol ban with synthetic coolants.;Page;Tob Control,2023

4. Abouk? R, De? PK, Pesko? M. Estimating the effects of Tobacco-21 on youth tobacco use and sales.? SSRN. Preprint posted online January 12, 2021. Updated January 10, 2023. Accessed May 14, 2022. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3737506

5. Fox? BJ, Lightwood? JM, Glantz? SA. A public health analysis of the proposed resolution of [the 1997 United States] tobacco litigation. eScholarship.org. February 1998. Accessed June 1, 2023. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5qc0x23w