Consistency and Adequacy of Public and Commercial Health Insurance for US Children, 2016 to 2021

Author:

Daw Jamie R.1,Yekta Sarra1,Jacobson-Davies Faelan E.2,Patrick Stephen W.34,Admon Lindsay K.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

3. Departments of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt Center for Child Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

4. Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt Center for Child Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

5. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Abstract

ImportanceBefore and during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), commercially and publicly insured children may have faced different challenges in obtaining consistent and adequate health insurance.ObjectiveTo compare overall rates, COVID-19 PHE-related changes, and child and family characteristics associated with inconsistent and inadequate coverage for publicly and commercially insured children.Design, Settings, and ParticipantsThis was a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from the 2016 to 2021 National Survey of Children’s Health of children from age 0 to 17 years living in noninstitutional settings.ExposureParent- or caregiver-reported current child health insurance type defined as public or commercial.Main Outcomes and MeasuresInconsistent insurance, defined as having an insurance gap in the past year; and inadequate insurance, defined by failure to meet 3 criteria: (1) benefits usually/always sufficient to meet child’s needs; (2) coverage usually/always allows child to access needed health care practitioners; and (3) no or usually/always reasonable annual out-of-pocket payments for child’s health care. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to compare outcomes by insurance type, by year (2020-2021 vs 2016-2019), and by child characteristics within insurance type.ResultsOf this nationally representative sample of 203 691 insured children, 34.5% were publicly insured (mean [SD] age, 8.4 [4.1] years; 47.4% female) and 65.5% were commercially insured (mean [SD] age, 8.7 [5.6]; 49.1% female). Most publicly insured children were either non-Hispanic Black (20.9%) or Hispanic (36.4%); living with 2 married parents (38.4%) or a single parent (33.1%); and had a household income less than 200% of the federal poverty level (79%). Most commercially insured children were non-Hispanic White (62.8%), living with 2 married parents (79.0%); and had a household income of 400% of the federal poverty level or higher (49.1%). Compared with commercially insured children, publicly insured children had higher rates of inconsistent coverage (4.2% vs 1.4%; difference, 2.7 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, 2.3 to 3.2) and lower rates of inadequate coverage (12.2% vs 33.0%; difference, −20.8 pp; 95% CI, −21.6 to −20.0). Compared with the period from 2016 to 2019, inconsistent insurance decreased by 42% for publicly insured children and inadequate insurance decreased by 6% for commercially insured children during the COVID-19 PHE (2020-2021). The child and family characteristics associated with inadequate and inconsistent insurance varied by insurance type.Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this cross-sectional study indicate that insurance gaps are a particular problem for publicly insured children, whereas insurance inadequacy and particularly, out-of-pocket costs are a challenge for commercially insured children. Both challenges improved during the COVID-19 PHE. Improving children’s health coverage after the PHE will require policy solutions that target the unique needs of commercially and publicly insured children.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3