Estimated Monetary Value of Future Research Clarifying Uncertainties Around the Optimal Adult Hearing Screening Schedule

Author:

Borre Ethan D.12,Myers Evan R.3,Dubno Judy R.4,Emmett Susan D.56,Pavon Juliessa M.7,Francis Howard W.5,Ogbuoji Osondu68,Sanders Schmidler Gillian D.129

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

2. Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

3. Division of Women’s Community and Population Health, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

4. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina

5. Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

6. Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

7. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

8. Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina

9. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

Abstract

ImportanceAdult hearing screening is not routinely performed, and most individuals with hearing loss (HL) have never had their hearing tested as adults.ObjectiveTo project the monetary value of future research clarifying uncertainties around the optimal adult hearing screening schedule.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this economic evaluation, a validated decision model of HL (DeciBHAL-US: Decision model of the Burden of Hearing loss Across the Lifespan) was used to simulate current detection and treatment of HL vs hearing screening schedules. Key model inputs included HL incidence (0.06%-10.42%/y), hearing aid uptake (0.54%-8.14%/y), screening effectiveness (1.62 × hearing aid uptake), utility benefits of hearing aids (+0.11), and hearing aid device costs ($3690). Distributions to model parameters for probabilistic uncertainty analysis were assigned. The expected value of perfect information (EVPI) and expected value of partial perfect information (EVPPI) using a willingness to pay of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was estimated. The EVPI and EVPPI estimate the upper bound of the dollar value of future research. This study was based on 40-year-old persons over their remaining lifetimes in a US primary care setting.ExposuresScreening schedules beginning at ages 45, 55, 65, and 75 years, and frequencies of every 1 or 5 years.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were QALYs and costs (2020 US dollars) from a health system perspective.ResultsThe average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for yearly screening beginning at ages 55 to 75 years ranged from $39 200 to $80 200/QALY. Yearly screening beginning at age 55 years was the optimal screening schedule in 38% of probabilistic uncertainty analysis simulations. The population EVPI, or value of reducing all uncertainty, was $8.2 to $12.6 billion varying with willingness to pay and the EVPPI, or value of reducing all screening effectiveness uncertainty, was $2.4 billion.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this economic evaluation of US adult hearing screening, large uncertainty around the optimal adult hearing screening schedule was identified. Future research on hearing screening has a high potential value so is likely justified.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3