Association of State Funding for Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care With Use of Contraception Among Latina Patients and Non-Latina Patients in Oregon

Author:

Cohen Megan A.12,Boniface Emily R.1,Skye Megan1,Linz Rachel3,Pedhiwala Nisreen3,Rodriguez Maria I.14

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland

2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

3. Reproductive Health Program, Oregon Health Authority, Portland

4. Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland

Abstract

ImportanceThere are well-documented racial and ethnic disparities in effective contraceptive use due to multiple factors. A key contributor may be differential insurance coverage and patient costs. The Oregon Reproductive Health Equity Act (RHEA), enacted in 2017, ensures full coverage of reproductive health care without cost sharing for all Oregonians with low income.ObjectiveTo assess whether removing financial barriers to accessing contraceptive care is associated with an improvement in use of moderately and highly effective contraceptive methods among Latina women compared with non-Latina women.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study included women aged 12 to 51 years who sought contraceptive care in the Oregon Health Authority Reproductive Health Program from April 2016 to March 2020. Patients using permanent contraception, those missing data on ethnicity, and non-Oregon residents were excluded. Data analysis was performed in January 2021.ExposuresContraceptive care in the Reproductive Health Program after RHEA implementation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcome was prevalence of use of moderately effective methods (contraceptive pills, patch, ring, or injection) or highly effective methods (long-acting reversible contraceptives) at the time of the contraceptive visit. Difference-in-differences analysis was used to compare moderately and highly effective contraception use between Latina and non-Latina patients. Secondary outcomes were proportions of adoption or continuation of moderately and highly effective methods, prevalence of highly effective methods, and adoption or continuation of highly effective methods. The unit of analysis was at the clinic visit level.ResultsThe study sample consisted of 295 604 evaluable clinic visits, in which 28.4% of individuals identified as Latina and 71.6% of individuals identified as non-Latina. The mean (SD) age was 25.5 (8.1) years. With difference-in-differences analysis, there was a significant adjusted 1.9 percentage point (95% CI, 0.2-3.6 percentage points) increase in prevalence of moderately or highly effective contraceptive methods for Latina patients compared with non-Latina patients. There were no significant differences for other outcomes of interest.ConclusionsThis cohort study found that in Oregon, legislation removing financial barriers to accessing contraceptive care was associated with significant mitigation in disparate moderately and highly effective contraceptive method prevalence for Latina patients compared with non-Latina patients. The findings suggest that state funds successfully supplanted federal funds to enable continued robust comprehensive family planning services after withdrawal from Title X.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference44 articles.

1. New clinical performance measures for contraceptive care: their importance to healthcare quality.;Gavin;Contraception,2017

2. Performance measures for contraceptive care: a new tool to enhance access to contraception.;Moniz;Obstet Gynecol,2017

3. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013.;Daniels;NCHS Data Brief,2014

4. Racial and ethnic disparities in contraceptive method choice in California.;Shih;Perspect Sex Reprod Health,2011

5. Racial/ethnic disparities in contraceptive use: variation by age and women’s reproductive experiences.;Dehlendorf;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3