A Learning Assessment to Increase Diversity in Academic Health Sciences

Author:

Alegría Margarita123,Thurston Idia Binitie4567,Cheng Michelle1,Herrera Christian4,Markle Sheri Lapatin1,O’Malley Isabel Shaheen8,Porter Danielle7,Estrada Rodolfo9,Giraldo-Santiago Natalia10

Affiliation:

1. Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Mongan Institute, Boston

2. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

4. CHANGE Lab, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts

5. Institute for Health Equity and Social Justice Research, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts

6. Department of Health Sciences and Applied Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts

7. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station

8. School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, College Park

9. Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

10. Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

Abstract

ImportanceStrategies and innovations to advance racial and ethnic equity in recruitment, promotion, and retention at academic health science institutions are needed.ObjectiveThis learning assessment aims to isolate evidence-based strategies to advance racial equity in the academic health sciences, which have implications for policy and institution-level interventions.Evidence ReviewThis learning assessment used a mixed-methods approach, including a quantitative survey, qualitative in-depth interviews, and a scoping literature review. Survey respondents were recruited from outreach lists that included researchers working with racial and ethnic minoritized populations. In-depth interviews were conducted among 60 university administrators, faculty/staff, scholars, students, and individuals affiliated with governmental, nongovernmental, and identity-based professional associations. A search of the literature in PsycINFO, MEDLINE, ERIC, Education Source, Academic Search Ultimate, and CINAHL was conducted for the scoping review. The scoping review included 366 primary articles of studies evaluating strategies to advance racial and ethnic equity at academic health science institutions.FindingsThe survey yielded analyzable results from 328 individuals, including faculty, students, administrators, or staff, and individuals not currently employed at or enrolled full time at a university or college. The interviews included 60 participants with a mean (SD) age of 49.3 (16.5) years, and 39 (65%) were female. The scoping review included 366 primary research articles that met inclusion criteria for analysis. Data were analyzed individually across the survey, interviews, and scoping review, and findings were triangulated. While each of the 3 assessments yielded unique findings, 13 common themes emerged across all project components. Results revealed strategies implemented and evaluated successfully, as well as challenges and barriers to advancing equity in the academic health sciences.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, 13 meaningful strategies emerged across the survey, in-depth interviews, and scoping review. Through triangulation of findings, recommendations of actionable steps were made.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3