Association of Hospice Payer With Concurrent Receipt of Hospice and Dialysis Among US Veterans With End-stage Kidney Disease

Author:

Wachterman Melissa W.1234,Corneau Emily E.5,O’Hare Ann M.67,Keating Nancy L.28,Mor Vincent59

Affiliation:

1. Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

4. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts

5. Long Term Services and Supports Center of Innovation, Veterans Affairs Providence Health Care System, Providence, Rhode Island

6. Department of Medicine and Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle

7. Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington

8. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

9. Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island

Abstract

ImportanceFor many patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), the Medicare Hospice Benefit precludes concurrent receipt of hospice and dialysis services, forcing patients to choose between continuing dialysis or enrolling in hospice. Whether the more liberal hospice eligibility criteria of the Veterans Health Administration’s (VA) are associated with improved access to concurrent dialysis and hospice care for patients with ESKD is not known.ObjectiveTo examine the frequency of concurrent hospice and dialysis care among US veterans by hospice payer and examine the payer for concurrent dialysis.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional study of all 70 577 VA enrollees in the US Renal Data System registry who initiated maintenance dialysis and died in 2007 to 2016. Data were analyzed from April 2021 to August 2022.ExposuresHospice payer, either Medicare, VA inpatient hospice, or VA-financed community-based hospice (“VA community care”). Primary hospice diagnosis–ESKD vs non-ESKD.Main Outcomes and MeasuresConcurrent receipt of hospice and dialysis services (“concurrent care”).ResultsThere were 18 420 (26%) eligible veterans with ESKD who received hospice services (mean [SD] age, 75.4 [10.0] years; 17 457 [94.8%] men; 2997 [16.3%] Black, 15 162 [82.3%] White, and 261 (1.4%) individuals of other races). Most of the sample (n = 16 465; 89%) received hospice services under Medicare and 5231 (28%) continued to receive dialysis after hospice initiation. The adjusted proportion of veterans receiving concurrent care was higher for those enrolled in VA inpatient hospice or VA community care hospice than it was for those enrolled in Medicare hospice (55% and 42% vs 25%, respectively; both P < .001). Regardless of hospice payer, the majority (87%) of the dialysis treatments after hospice initiation were financed by the VA, including for Medicare beneficiaries who had a hospice diagnosis other than ESKD. Median hospice length of stay was 43 days for veterans who received concurrent dialysis vs 4 days for those who did not.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this retrospective cross-sectional study of US veterans with ESKD, a substantially higher proportion of veterans in VA-financed hospice received 1 or more dialysis treatments after hospice initiation than those enrolled in Medicare-financed hospice. Regardless of hospice payer, the VA financed most concurrent dialysis treatments. Hospice users who received concurrent dialysis care had substantially longer hospice lengths of stay than those who did not. These findings suggest that Medicare hospice policy may substantially restrict access to concurrent hospice and dialysis care among veterans with ESKD.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference28 articles.

1. Cost savings in hospice: final results of the National Hospice Study.;Mor;Health Serv Res,1985

2. The terrible choice: re-evaluating hospice eligibility criteria for cancer.;Casarett;J Clin Oncol,2009

3. Hospice innovation impediments: can halfway efforts tame the terrible choice?;Lupu;J Palliat Med,2014

4. Payment for dialysis services in the individual market.;Trish;JAMA Intern Med,2021

5. Dying well after discontinuing the life-support treatment of dialysis.;Cohen;Arch Intern Med,2000

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3