Fractional Flow Reserve–Negative High-Risk Plaques and Clinical Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction

Author:

Mol Jan-Quinten1,Volleberg Rick H. J. A.1,Belkacemi Anouar2,Hermanides Renicus S.3,Meuwissen Martijn4,Protopopov Alexey V.5,Laanmets Peep6,Krestyaninov Oleg V.7,Dennert Robert8,Oemrawsingh Rohit M.9,van Kuijk Jan-Peter10,Arkenbout Karin11,van der Heijden Dirk J.312,Rasoul Saman1314,Lipsic Erik15,Rodwell Laura16,Camaro Cyril1,Damman Peter1,Roleder Tomasz17,Kedhi Elvin18,van Leeuwen Maarten A. H.3,van Geuns Robert-Jan M.1,van Royen Niels1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

2. Department of Cardiology, AZ West Hospital, Veurne, Belgium

3. Department of Cardiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands

4. Department of Cardiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands

5. Cardiovascular Center of Regional State Hospital, Krasnoyarsk, Russia

6. Cardiology Center, North Estonia Medical Center, Tallinn, Estonia

7. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia

8. Department of Cardiology, Dr. Horacio E. Oduber Hospital, Oranjestad, Aruba

9. Department of Cardiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands

10. Department of Cardiology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands

11. Department of Cardiology, Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum, the Netherlands

12. Department of Cardiology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands

13. Department of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands

14. Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands

15. Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

16. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Technology Assessment, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

17. Department of Cardiology, Regional Specialist Hospital, Wrocław, Poland

18. Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

ImportanceEven after fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided complete revascularization, patients with myocardial infarction (MI) have high rates of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). These recurrences may be caused by FFR-negative high-risk nonculprit lesions.ObjectiveTo assess the association between optical coherence tomography (OCT)-identified high-risk plaques of FFR-negative nonculprit lesions and occurrence of MACE in patients with MI.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsPECTUS-obs (Identification of Risk Factors for Acute Coronary Events by OCT After STEMI [ST-segment elevation MI] and NSTEMI [non-STEMI] in Patients With Residual Non–flow Limiting Lesions) is an international, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study. In patients presenting with MI, OCT was performed on all FFR-negative (FFR > 0.80) nonculprit lesions. A high-risk plaque was defined containing at least 2 of the following prespecified criteria: (1) a lipid arc at least 90°, (2) a fibrous cap thickness less than 65 μm, and (3) either plaque rupture or thrombus presence. Patients were enrolled from December 14, 2018, to September 15, 2020. Data were analyzed from December 2, 2022, to June 28, 2023.Main Outcome and MeasureThe primary end point of MACE, a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unplanned revascularization, at 2-year follow-up was compared in patients with and without a high-risk plaque.ResultsA total of 438 patients were enrolled, and OCT findings were analyzable in 420. Among included patients, mean (SD) age was 63 (10) years, 340 (81.0) were men, and STEMI and non-STEMI were equally represented (217 [51.7%] and 203 [48.3%]). A mean (SD) of 1.17 (0.42) nonculprit lesions per patient was imaged. Analysis of OCT images revealed at least 1 high-risk plaque in 143 patients (34.0%). The primary end point occurred in 22 patients (15.4%) with a high-risk plaque and 23 of 277 patients (8.3%) without a high-risk plaque (hazard ratio, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.08-3.47]; P = .02), primarily driven by more unplanned revascularizations in patients with a high-risk plaque (14 of 143 [9.8%] vs 12 of 277 [4.3%]; P = .02).Conclusions and RelevanceAmong patients with MI and FFR-negative nonculprit lesions, the presence of a high-risk plaque is associated with a worse clinical outcome, which is mainly driven by a higher number of unplanned revascularizations. In a population with a high recurrent event rate despite physiology-guided complete revascularization, these results call for research on additional pharmacological or focal treatment strategies in patients harboring high-risk plaques.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Functional vs Anatomical Complete Revascularization;Journal of the American College of Cardiology;2024-01

2. Medically Treated Nonischemic Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma Lesions Versus Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization in Diabetic Patients;Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions;2023-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3