Quality of Care and Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure in Rural vs Urban US Hospitals

Author:

Pierce Jacob B.1,Ikeaba Uchechukwu2,Peters Anthony E.23,DeVore Adam D.23,Chiswell Karen2,Allen Larry A.4,Albert Nancy M.5,Yancy Clyde W.67,Fonarow Gregg C.89,Greene Stephen J.23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

2. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina

3. Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

4. Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora

5. Nursing Institute and Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

6. Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

7. Deputy Editor, JAMA Cardiology

8. Ahmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, University of California, Los Angeles

9. Associate Editor for Health Care Quality and Guidelines, JAMA Cardiology

Abstract

ImportancePrior studies have suggested patients with heart failure (HF) from rural areas have worse clinical outcomes. Contemporary differences between rural and urban hospitals in quality of care and clinical outcomes for patients hospitalized for HF remain poorly understood.ObjectiveTo assess quality of care and clinical outcomes for US patients hospitalized for HF at rural vs urban hospitals.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 774 419 patients hospitalized for HF across 569 sites in the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) registry between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2021. Postdischarge outcomes were assessed in a subset of 161 996 patients linked to Medicare claims. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to January 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresGWTG-HF quality measures, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and 30-day mortality and readmission outcomes.ResultsThis study included 19 832 patients (2.6%) and 754 587 patients (97.4%) hospitalized at 49 rural hospitals (8.6%) and 520 urban hospitals (91.4%), respectively. Of 774 419 included patients, 366 161 (47.3%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 73 (62-83) years. Compared with patients at urban hospitals, patients at rural hospitals were older (median [IQR] age, 74 [64-84] years vs 73 [61-83] years; standardized difference, 10.63) and more likely to be non-Hispanic White (14 572 [73.5%] vs 498 950 [66.1%]; standardized difference, 34.47). In adjusted models, patients at rural hospitals were less likely to be prescribed cardiac resynchronization therapy (adjusted risk difference [aRD], −13.5%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.92), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (aRD, −3.7%; aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.96), and an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (aRD, −5.0%; aOR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.98) at discharge. In-hospital mortality was similar between rural and urban hospitals (460 of 19 832 [2.3%] vs 20 529 of 754 587 [2.7%]; aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07). Patients at rural hospitals were less likely to have a length of stay of 4 or more days (aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.85). Among Medicare beneficiaries, there were no significant differences between rural and urban hospitals in 30-day HF readmission (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.90-1.19), all-cause readmission (aHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.04), and all-cause mortality (aHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.91-1.21).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this large contemporary cohort of US patients hospitalized for HF, care at rural hospitals was independently associated with lower use of some guideline-recommended therapies at discharge and shorter length of stay. In-hospital mortality and 30-day postdischarge outcomes were similar at rural and urban hospitals.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3