Evaluating the Application of Chronic Heart Failure Therapies and Developing Treatments in Individuals With Recent Myocardial Infarction

Author:

Harrington Josephine12,Petrie Mark C.3,Anker Stefan D.4567,Bhatt Deepak L.8,Jones W. Schuyler12,Udell Jacob A.9,Hernandez Adrian F.12,Butler Javed1011

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

2. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

3. Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

4. Department of Cardiology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

5. Institute of Heart Disease, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland

6. Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

7. German Centre for Cardiovascular Research partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany

8. Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

9. Women’s College Hospital and Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

10. Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas

11. Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi, Jackson

Abstract

ImportanceDespite advances in cardiac care, patients remain at a high risk of death and the development of heart failure (HF) following myocardial infarction (MI). These risks are highest in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) or signs of HF immediately after MI. Drugs to mitigate these risks have been identified through the systematic evaluation of therapies with proven efficacy in patients with HF and reduced EF (HFrEF).ObservationsAlthough landmark studies in patients with HFrEF consistently exclude patients with recent MI, dedicated post-MI trials of these drugs have led to multiple therapies with proven benefit in these patients. However, not all therapies with proven efficacy in patients with chronic HF have been shown to provide benefit in the post-MI population, as recently evidenced by the discrepant results between chronic HF and post-MI trials of sacubitril-valsartan. Similarly, multiple trials of early and aggressive use of therapies effective in chronic heart failure immediately post-MI failed to demonstrate benefit or were associated with harm, emphasizing the vulnerability of the post-MI population.Conclusions and RelevanceTrials of patients at high risk of HF following MI have emphasized the differences between the post-MI and HFrEF populations and the necessity for dedicated trials in the post-MI population. This review summarizes trials studying the use of these therapies for at-risk patients following MI from therapies used in patients with HFrEF and exploring new potential therapies for this high-risk population.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3