Author:
Wang Yipeng,Wang Peiqi,Ye Shiyang,Shi Yu,He Yiruo,Han Xianglong,Bai Ding,Xue Chaoran
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Objectives
To determine the optimal settings for reconstructing the buccal surfaces of different tooth types using the virtual bracket removal (VBR) technique.
Materials and Methods
Ten postbonded digital dentitions (with their original prebonded dentitions) were enrolled. The VBR protocol was carried out under five settings from three commonly used computer-aided design (CAD) systems: OrthoAnalyzer (O); Meshmixer (M); and curvature (G2), tangent (G1), and flat (G0) from Geomagic Studio. The root mean squares (RMSs) between the reconstructed and prebonded dentitions were calculated for each tooth and compared with the clinically acceptable limit (CAL) of 0.10 mm.
Results
The overall prevalences of RMSs below the CAL were 66.80%, 70.08%, 62.30%, 94.83%, and 56.15% under O, M, G2, G1, and G0, respectively. For the upper dentition, the mean RMSs were significantly lower than the CAL for all tooth types under G1 and upper incisors and canines under M and G2. For the lower dentition, the mean RMSs were significantly lower than the CAL for all tooth types under G1 and lower incisors and canines under M, G2, and G0 (all P < .05). Additionally, the mean RMSs of all teeth under G1 were significantly lower than those under the other settings (all P < .001).
Conclusions
The optimal settings varied among different tooth types. G1 performed best for most tooth types compared to the other four settings.
Publisher
The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)
Reference18 articles.
1. Orthodontic treatment of severe anterior open bite and alveolar bone defect complicated by an ankylosed maxillary central incisor: a case report;Lin;Head Face Med,2014
2. Intraoral digital scanners;Kravitz;J Clin Orthod,2014
3. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial;Mohammed;Eur J Orthod,2017
4. Moving towards precision orthodontics: an evolving paradigm shift in the planning and delivery of customized orthodontic therapy;Jheon;Orthod Craniofac Res,2017
5. Comparison of intraoral 3D scanning and conventional impressions for fabrication of orthodontic retainers;Vasudavan;J Clin Orthod,2010