Author:
Gazzani Francesca,Bellisario Denise,Fazi Laura,Balboni Alessia,Licoccia Silvia,Pavoni Chiara,Cozza Paola,Lione Roberta
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Objectives
To evaluate wear and friction properties of oscillating strips in order to validate the importance of a standardized interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) sequence to preserve their efficiency and lifetime.
Materials and Methods
Fifteen complete oscillating IPR sequences were tested by means of tribological tests (Linear Reciprocating Tribometer, C.S.M. Instruments, Peseaux, Switzerland). Fifteen single 0.2-mm metallic strips underwent a long continuous cycle of 240 minutes. Strip surface roughness and waviness measurements were assessed by means of a contact probe surface profiler (TalySurf CLI 2000; Taylor Hobson, Leicester, UK) and TayMap software. Statistical analysis was performed with independent-samples t-test. Significance was at the P < .05 level. Scanning electronic microscopy analysis of strip surfaces was conducted with an FEI Quanta 200 (Hillsboro, Ore) in high vacuum at 30.00 kV.
Results
Resin strips revealed a significant reduction in surface roughness (Ra, Rt, RDq) and a significant increase in waviness parameters (Wa, Wt). Rt and RDq values significantly decreased upon use of the metallic strips. Significantly higher values of Wa (+ 2.84 µm) and Wt (+0.1 µm) were observed only for the 0.2-mm metallic strips. Higher friction values were observed when the metallic strips were tested singularly rather than within the entire sequence. Lower Ra and Rt values were revealed when 0.2-mm metallic strips were tested up to 240 minutes.
Conclusions
The application of a standardized oscillating sequence allows for more efficient wear performance of the strips with a significant impact on their abrasive power and lifetime.
Publisher
The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)
Reference18 articles.
1. Guidelines for contemporary air-rotor stripping;Sheridan;J Clin Orthod,2007
2. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion;Bolton;Angle Orthod,1958
3. Enamel reduction procedures in orthodontic treatment;Rossouw;J Can Dent Assoc,2003
4. Comparison of the abrasive properties of two different systems for interproximal enamel reduction: oscillating versus manual strips;Gazzani;BMC Oral Health.,2019
5. Enamel reduction techniques in orthodontics: a literature review;Livas;Open Dent J,2013