The Validity of In Vivo Tooth Volume Determinations From Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Author:

Liu Yi1,Olszewski Raphael2,Alexandroni Emanuel Stefan3,Enciso Reyes4,Xu Tianmin5,Mah James K.67

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, China

2. Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Univeriste Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

3. Clinical Instructor, Division of Craniofacial Sciences and Therapeutics, School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif

4. Assistant Professor of Clinical Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif

5. Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, China

6. Associate Professor, School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif

7. Corresponding author: Dr James K. Mah, School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, 925W, 34th ST, DEN 312, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0641 (james.mah@usc.edu)

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To determine the accuracy of volumetric analysis of teeth in vivo using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: The physical volume (Vw) of 24 bicuspids extracted for orthodontic purposes (16 were imaged with the I-CAT and 8 with the CB MercuRay) were determined using the water displacement technique. Corresponding pretreatment CBCT image data were uploaded into Amira 4.0 for segmentation and radiographic volume (Va). All measurements were performed twice by two observers. The statistical difference between Vw and Va was assessed using a paired t-test. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: The overall mean Vw of teeth specimens was 0.553 ± 0.082 cm3, while the overall mean Va was 0.548 ± 0.079 cm3 (0.529 ± 0.078 cm3 for observer 1 and 0.567 ± 0.085 cm3 for observer 2). There were statistically significant differences between Va and Vw (P < .05). Between observer 1 and observer 2, Va measurements were statistically significantly different (P < .05). The interobserver and intraobserver correlation coefficient for Vw was high. Lastly, surface smoothing reduced the volume by 3% to 12%. Conclusions: In vivo determination of tooth volumes from CBCT data is feasible. The measurements slightly deviate from the physical volumes within −4% to 7%. Smoothing operations reduce volume measurements. Currently, no requirements for accuracy of volumetric determinations of tooth volume have been established.

Publisher

The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)

Subject

Orthodontics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3