Labial frenectomy: current clinical practice of orthodontists in the United Kingdom

Author:

Ahn John HyunBaek,Newton Tim,Campbell Catherine

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives To obtain views of orthodontists in the United Kingdom on frenectomy in terms of its indications and timing and a recommended retention regimen after correction of median diastema. Materials and Methods A 14-item online questionnaire was sent to orthodontic specialists for completion. The questionnaire covered demographics and orthodontists' experience and views on frenectomy. Results Three hundred and fifty-three orthodontists with various background and experience responded to the survey. Three-quarters of respondents routinely performed a blanche test to aid diagnosis of the abnormal frenum; however, only 15% carried out radiographic investigation. Three-quarters of the orthodontists would consider frenectomy as a part of orthodontic treatment, and variation existed among the clinicians in terms of its timing. Frenectomy without orthodontic treatment was not preferred. There was much variation in the retention regimen after diastema closure regardless of frenectomy. Conclusions Complete consensus among the orthodontists was not obtained; however, some agreement was found regarding the development of a logical diagnosis and treatment approach. High-quality studies are required to produce national protocols or UK guidelines.

Publisher

The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)

Subject

Orthodontics

Reference31 articles.

1. Bishara SE. Management of diastemas in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1972;61:55–63.

2. Broadbent BH. The face of a normal child (diagnosis, development). Angle Orthod. 1937;7:183–208.

3. Gardiner JH. Midline spaces. Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1967;17:287–298.

4. Taylor JE. Clinical observations relating to the normal and abnormal frenum labii superioris. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1939;25:646–650.

5. Weyman J. The incidence of median diastema during the eruption of the permanent teeth. Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1967;17:276–278.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3