Patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery: A systematic review

Author:

Pachêco-Pereira Camila1,Abreu Lucas G.2,Dick Bruce D.3,De Luca Canto Graziela4,Paiva Saul M.5,Flores-Mir Carlos6

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Clinical Professor, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

2. PhD student, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

3. Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Department of Psychiatry & Pediatrics, and Chief of Psychology, Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

4. Associate Professor, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil, and Adjunct Professor, Department of Dentistry School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

5. Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

6. Professor and Division Head of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective:  To synthesize available evidence about factors associated with patients’ satisfaction after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery. Materials and Methods:  Studies that evaluated any factor associated with patients’ satisfaction after the conclusion of an orthodontic treatment combined with an orthognathic surgery were identified. Orthognathic surgical procedures should have been undertaken after completion of craniofacial growth. Any satisfaction psychometric tool was considered. No language limitation was set. A detailed individual search strategy for each of the following bibliographic databases was crafted: MEDLINE, PubMed, EBM Reviews, Web of Science, EMBASE, LILACS, and Scopus. The references cited in the identified articles were also cross-checked, and a partial gray-literature search was undertaken using Google Scholar. Results:  Eight articles satisfied the inclusion criteria of this systematic review and accounted for 998 patients. The included studies showed large variation in sample size (range  =  44 to 505 patients), age (range  =  15 to 72 years old), distinct psychological evaluation tools, and time elapsed between the assessment and the completion of surgery and postorthodontic treatment. Most of the studies (five of eight) were classified as having high risk of bias. Conclusion:  Factors associated with satisfaction were final esthetic outcome, perceived social benefits from the outcome, type of orthognathic surgery, sex, and changes in patient self-concept during treatment. Factors associated with dissatisfaction were treatment length; sensation of functional impairment and/or dysfunction after surgery, and perceived omitted information about surgical risks.

Publisher

The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)

Subject

Orthodontics

Cited by 55 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3