Bioequivalence study of fixed-dose combination Losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin Sanofi in comparison with coadministered fixed- dose combination Lozap® AM and monocomponent drug Crestor® in healthy subjects

Author:

Khokhlov A. L.1ORCID,Grebenkin D. Yu.2ORCID,Faeva E. K.2ORCID,Kazey V. I.2ORCID,Khokhlov A. A.3ORCID,Miroshnikov A. E.3ORCID,Lebedeva O. V.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Academy of Sciences

2. LLC ExacteLabs

3. LLC ClinPharmInvest

4. Representative office of Sanofi (France)

Abstract

   Introduction. The advantages of fixed-dose combination losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin compared to mono-drugs and two-component combinations are to increase the therapeutic efficacy, to reduce the cost of the product and to make the drug easier to take which helps to improve patient adherence to therapy. A bioequivalence study of the three-component fixed-dose combinations Losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin Sanofi with coadministered Lozap® AM (Losartan+Amlodipine) and Crestor® (Rosuvastatin) was conducted.   Aim. The purpose of the bioequivalence trial was a comparative study of the pharmacokinetics and evidence of the bioequivalence of two strengths of fixed-dose combination: 1) Losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin Sanofi (tablets, 50 mg + 5 mg + 10 mg) in comparison with coadministrated drugs Lozap® AM (losartan + amlodipine, tablets, 50 mg + 5 mg,) and Crestor® (rosuvastatin, tablets, 10 mg) in fasting healthy volunteers after a single administration; 2) Losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin Sanofi (tablets, 100 mg + 5 mg + 20 mg) in comparison with coadministrated drugs Lozap® AM (losartan + amlodipine, tablets, 100 mg + 5 mg) and Crestor® (rosuvastatin, tablets, 20 mg) in fasting healthy volunteers 18–45 years old after a single dose.   Materials and methods. To prove bioequivalence, an open label, comparative, randomized, crossover four-period clinical trial was conducted for each strengths of fixed-dose combination. The concentrations of losartan, amlodipine and rosuvastatin in blood plasma samples obtained from volunteers were determined by a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. A pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis was performed and confidence intervals (CI) for the pharmacokinetic parameters Сmax, AUC0-72 (for amlodipine) and AUC0-t (for losartan and rosuvastatin) were calculated.      Results and discussion. Based on the results of statistical and pharmacokinetic analysis, it was shown that the studied formulations are bioequivalent in terms of pharmacokinetic parameters of losartan, amlodipine and rosuvastatin. 90 % CI were in the acceptable range for Сmax (of amlodipine), AUC0-72 (of amlodipine) and AUC0-t (of losartan and rosuvastatin). 90 % CI for Сmax of losartan and rosuvastatin were in the acceptable extended calculated range according to the protocol.   Conclusion. Thus, according to the criteria used in the studies, the three-component fixed-dose combinations Losartan + amlodipine + rosuvastatin Sanofi are proved to be bioequivalent in comparison with coadministered Lozap® AM and Crestor®.

Publisher

Publishing House OKI

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science

Reference15 articles.

1. Harikrishnan S., Jeemon P., Mini G.K., Thankappan K. R. et al. GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018; 392 (10159): 1736–1788. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7.

2. Kotseva K., De Backer G., De Bacquer D., Rydén L. et al. Lifestyle and impact on cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary patients across 27 countries: Results from the European Society of Cardiology ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry. European journal of preventive cardiology. 2019; 26 (8): 824–835. DOI: 10.1177/2047487318825350.

3. Dresser G. K., Nelson S. A., Mahon J. L., Zou G. et al. Simplified therapeutic intervention to control hypertension and hypercholesterolemia: a cluster randomized controlled trial (STITCH2). J Hypertens. 2013; 31 (8): 1702–1713. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283619d6a.

4. Sniderman A. D., Williams K., Contois J. H., Monroe H. M. et al. A meta-analysis of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B as markers of cardiovascular risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4 (3): 337–345. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.959247.

5. Satoh M., Ohkubo T., Asayama K., Murakami Y. et al. Combined effect of blood pressure and total cholesterol levels on long-term risks of subtypes of cardiovascular death: evidence for cardiovascular prevention from observational cohorts in Japan. Hypertension. 2015; 65 (3): 517–524. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04639.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3