Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: a systematic review

Author:

Motrinchuk A. Sh.1ORCID,Loginovskaya O. A.2ORCID,Kolbatov V. P.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

2. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Flex Databases LLC

3. Flex Databases LLC

Abstract

Signal detection is a crucial step in the discovery of post-marketing adverse drug reactions. There is a growing interest in using routinely collected data to complement established spontaneous report analyses.The aim. This work aims to systematically review the methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected healthcare data and their performance, both in general and for specific types of drugs and outcomes.Metodology. We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines, and registered a protocol in PROSPERO.Results. The review included 101 articles, among which there were 39 methodological works, 25 performance assessment papers, and 24 observational studies. Methods included adaptations from those used with spontaneous reports, traditional epidemiological designs, methods specific to signal detection with real-world data. More recently, implementations of machine learning have been studied in the literature. Twenty-five studies evaluated method performances, 16 of them using the area under the curve (AUC) for a range of positive and negative controls as their main measure. Despite the likelihood that performance measurement could vary by drug-event pair, only 10 studies reported performance stratified by drugs and outcomes, in a heterogeneous manner. The replicability of the performance assessment results was limited due to lack of transparency in reporting and the lack of a gold standard reference set.

Publisher

Publishing House OKI

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3