Author:
Процевський В. О.,Горбань В. І.
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to find ways of overcoming the etatistician legal tradition of regulating human rights in Ukraine in relation to the rights of the nation and the people. The contradictions between the articles of the Constitution of Ukraine on a person and his rights with his articles on restriction of human rights are revealed; between articles about the Ukrainian people and articles about the nation and national interests. The causal relationship between the positivist understanding of law as established and regulated by the state and the practice of legal regulation of human rights, the nation and the people as subjective objects, and not the natural subjects of civil society and the state - theirs, is investigated. servant. Alternative legal regulation based on the dialectic of the individual (person), special (nation), general (people) with the defining role of the people in the law, which includes not only legislation, but also norms of morality, customs, traditions, treaties, is argued. The ideological extremes of legal regulation are criticized: the hypertrophy of anthropocentrism and the sovereignty of the people. The key importance of the elimination of poverty of the people and the creation of a majority of middle-class middle-class majority for the achievement of the main goal of legal regulation of human rights, nation and people – to ensure their freedom is substantiated. As a result of the study, conclusions are drawn: on the advisability of adopting an official legal doctrine in Ukraine on the basis of modern European law of understanding as a source of law; on scientific development of subjects of non-state legal regulation; on amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine regarding the relation between the concepts of nations and peoples and the possibility of limiting a person not in rights, but in their implementation; on the criteria for the equitable legal regulation of mutual human rights, the nation and the people: its fullest endorsement by the majority of these entities as equal in their rights on the basis of the widest consensus between them throughout Ukraine and its individual regions and a steady tendency to increase the middle class in composition people.
Publisher
H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University
Reference44 articles.
1. Конституція України. Зміст. Чинний зі змінами. Перевірено 18.06.2019. URL: https://kodeksy.com.ua/konstitutsiya_ukraini.htm(дата звернення: 17.06.2019);
2. Загальна декларація прав людини ООН; прийнята і проголошена в резолюції 217 А (III) Генеральної Асамблеї від 10 грудня 1948 року. URL: http: // zakon. rada. gov. ua / laws/shov / 995_015 (дата звернення: 17.06.2019);
3. Статут Ради Європи. Документ 994_001, чинний, поточна редакція Приєднання від 31.10.1995. підстава – 398/95-ВР. URL: https:// zakon. rada. gov. ua / laws / show / 994_001 (дата звернення: 05.07.2019);
4. Процевський В. О., Горбань В. І. До реформи юридичної освіти в Україні: роздуми про принципи і зміст. Збірник наукових праць Харківського національного педагогічного університету імені Г.С. Сковороди «Право». Вип. 29. Харків. 2018. С. 7–16;
5. Ваньчук І. Д. Поняття й сутнісні ознаки правового регулю¬ван¬ня суспільних відносин: сучасний погляд. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. 2015. Серія Право. Випуск 32. Том 1. С. 7–10;