Abstract
We apply the Kakwani approach to decomposing redistributive effect intoaverage rate, progressivity, and reranking components, using yearly datafrom the United Kingdom covering the period of 1977-2018. We examinecash and in-kind benefits, and direct and indirect taxes. In addition, wehighlight an empirical implementation issue – the definition of the reference(pre-fisc) distribution. Drawing on an innovative counterfactual approach,our empirical analysis shows that trends in the redistributive effect of cashbenefits are largely associated with cyclical changes in average benefit rates.In contrast, trends in the redistributive effects of direct and indirect taxesare mostly associated with changes in progressivity. For in-kind benefits,changes in the average benefit rate and progressivity each played major rolesat different times.
Publisher
York University Libraries
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference36 articles.
1. Aronson, R., P. Johnson, and P.J. Lambert 1994 “Redistributive effect and unequal income tax treatment”, Economic Journal 104: 62–270.
2. Brewer, M., A. Corlett, K. Handscomb, and D. Tomlinson 2021 The Living Standards Outlook 2021 London: Resolution Foundation.
3. Canberra Group 2011 Handbook on Household Income Statistics 2nd ed. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
4. Hagenaars, A., K. de Vos, and M.A. Zaidi 1994 Poverty statistics in the late 1980s: research based on micro-data Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
5. Hérault, N., and F. Azpitarte 2015 “Recent trends in income redistribution in Australia: Can changes in the tax-benefit system account for the decline in redistribution?”, Economic Record 91(292): 38–53.