Abstract
Passport photography bans the display of emotion and aims at suppressing what speaks to our individual circumstances. This paper argues that the disempathy that results provides a starting point for moral imagination and a method for preserving political engagement beyond the reach of the state. The sharing of emotion concerns political theorists, however, who worry that judgment can be swamped by sentiment, making empathy an unruly or unreliable political resource. Passports represent an aspiration to regulate complex emotions by making identity and belonging a matter of state prerogative rather than interpersonal exchange. The rise of biometrics provides an opportunity to bring emotion under state supervision, dictating its display in a manner that echoes forms of social and racial performance. Efforts to pacify citizens may boomerang, nonetheless, by setting the conditions for unconventional forms of looking and recognition, methods available to individuals but not the states that govern them.
Publisher
York University Libraries
Reference27 articles.
1. Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Ed. Ronald Beiner. Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P, 1982. Print
2. Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. New York: Penguin Books, 1963. Print.
3. Azoulay, Ariella. “Photography.” Mafte’akh 2 (2011): 65-80. Print.
4. Azoulay, Ariella. “What is a Photograph? What is photography?” Philosophy of Photography 1.1 (2010): 9-13. Print.
5. Azoulay, Ariella. The Civil Contract of Photography. New York: Zone Books, 2008. Print.