Characterization of feed coals and coal combustion byproducts from the Wyodak-Anderson coal zone, Powder River Basin, Wyoming
-
Published:2020-07-01
Issue:3
Volume:57
Page:199-240
-
ISSN:0027-254X
-
Container-title:The Mountain Geologist
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:MT GEOL
Affiliation:
1. 2. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center
Abstract
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) determined the physical and chemical properties of more than 260 feed coal and coal combustion byproducts from two coal-fired power plants. These plants utilized a low-sulfur (0.23-0.47 wt. % S) and low ash (4.9-6.3 wt. % ash) subbituminous coal from the Wyodak-Anderson coal zone in the Tongue River Member of the Paleocene Fort Union Formation, Powder River Basin, Wyoming. Fifty-three samples of bituminous coal were collected and analyzed from a Kentucky power plant, which used several sources of bituminous coals from the Appalachian and Illinois Basins.
Based on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses of feed coal samples collected and analyzed from 1996 through the late 2000s, two mineral suites were identified: (1) a primary or detrital suite consisting of quartz (including beta-form grains), biotite, feldspar, and minor zircon; and (2) a secondary authigenic mineral suite containing alumino-phosphates (crandallite and gorceixite), kaolinite, carbonates (calcite and dolomite), quartz, anatase, barite, and pyrite. The detrital mineral suite is interpreted, in part, to be of volcanic origin, whereas the authigenic mineral suite is interpreted, in part, to be the result of the alteration of the volcanic minerals. The mineral suites have contributed to the higher amounts of barium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, sodium, strontium, and titanium in the Powder River Basin feed coals in comparison to eastern US coals.
XRD analysis indicates that (1) fly ash is mostly aluminate glass, perovskite, lime, gehlenite, quartz, and phosphates with minor amounts of periclase, anhydrite, hematite, and spinel group minerals; and (2) bottom ash is predominantly quartz, plagioclase (albite and anorthite), pyroxene (augite and fassaite), rhodonite, and akermanite, and spinel group minerals. Microprobe and SEM analyses of fly ash samples revealed quartz, zircon, and monazite, euhedral laths of corundum with merrillite, hematite, dendritic spinels/ferrites, wollastonite, and periclase. The abundant calcium and magnesium mineral phases in the fly ash are attributed to the alteration of carbonate, clay, and phosphate minerals in the feed coal during combustion.
The calcium- and magnesium-rich and alumino-phosphate mineral phases in the coal combustion byproducts can be attributed to volcanic minerals deposited in peat-forming mires. Dissolution and alteration of these detrital volcanic minerals occurred either in the peat-forming stage or during coalification and diagenesis, resulting in the authigenic mineral suite.
The presence of free lime (CaO) in fly ash produced from Wyodak-Anderson coal acts as a self-contained “scrubber” for SO3, where CaO + SO3 form anhydrite either during combustion or in the upper parts of the boiler. Considering the high lime content in the fly ash and the resulting hydration reactions after its contact with water, there is little evidence that major amounts of leachable metals are mobilized in the disposal or utilization of this fly ash.
Publisher
Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists
Reference63 articles.
1. Affolter, R.H., and Brownfield, M.E., 1987, Characterization of Lower Williams Fork Formation coals from the eastern Yampa coal field, Routt County, Colorado: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 19, no. 7, p. 567. https://doi.org/10.3133/b297 2. Affolter, R.H., Brownfield, M.E., and Breit, G.N., 1997, Temporal variations in the chemistry of feed coal, fly ash, and bottom ash from a coal-fired power plant: Proceedings of the 1997 International Ash Utilization Symposium, Center for Applied Energy Research, Lexington, Ky., October 20-22, 1997, p. 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6701(97)81238-6 3. Affolter, R.H., Brownfield, M.E., and Cathcart, J.D., 1999, Chemical variation of feed coal and coal combustion products from an Indiana power plant utilizing low sulfur Powder River Basin coal: Proceedings of the 1999 International Ash Utilization Symposium, Center for Applied Energy Research, Lexington, Ky., 7 p., On CD-ROM. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20045271 4. Affolter, R.H., Groves, S., Betterton, W.J., Benzel, William, Conrad, K.L., Swanson, S.M., Ruppert L.F., Clough J.G., Belkin, H.E., Kolker, A., and Hower, J.C., 2011, Geochemical database of feed coal and coal combustion products (CCPs) from five power plants in the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 635, CD-ROM., https://doi.org/10.3133/70006158, accessed 9/23/2019. https://doi.org/10.3133/70006158 5. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 1999a, 1999 Annual Book of ASTM Standards; Petroleum products, lubricants, and fossil fuels, sect. 5, v.05.05—Gaseous fuels, coal, and coke: Philadelphia, Pa., ASTM, 522 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90090-7
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|