Seismicity in Nebraska and adjacent states: The historical perspective and current trends
-
Published:2018-12
Issue:4
Volume:55
Page:217-229
-
ISSN:0027-254X
-
Container-title:The Mountain Geologist
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:MT GEOL
Author:
Filina Irina1, Guthrie Kris1, Searls Mindi1, Burberry Caroline1
Affiliation:
1. 2. The Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
Abstract
A sudden spike in earthquake events has been observed in central Nebraska. Since April 2018, 26 earthquakes with equivalent moment magnitudes from 2.7 to 4.1 occurred, clustered tightly in Custer County. A similar cluster of 24 earthquakes with equivalent moment magnitudes from 2.6 to 3.7 occurred in Jewell County in northern Kansas in 2017. We have compiled an earthquake database for Nebraska and parts of adjacent states from different sources to determine whether these recent earthquake spikes are consistent with historic seismicity. We identified two historic earthquake clusters occurring in our study area. The first contained 32 events and was active in Red Willow County in southwestern Nebraska from 1977 to 1982. As it coincides spatially with the Sleepy Hollow oil field, it may be related to enhanced oil recovery from that field, although it is also located at the edge of the Chadron-Cambridge Arch. The second historical earthquake cluster is located in Pawnee and Richardson counties in southwestern Nebraska and includes eight earthquakes with equivalent moment magnitudes of 2.3 to 2.8 that occurred in a period from 1982 to 1989 over the Nemaha uplift and appear to be related to the Humboldt fault. We note an increase in both maximum magnitude, as well as in the cumulative seismic moment per cluster with time. We have also used gravity and magnetic fields to map potential basement faults in the study area. Our analysis shows that the two recent earthquake spikes are aligned with the proposed basement faults. Despite this correlation, the cause of this sudden spike in seismicity is not well understood, as the stresses that might reactivate these basement faults are unknown. In addition, both recent clusters are distant from oil and gas operations. More seismic stations are necessary in central Nebraska in order to better detect focal depths and faulting style in the ongoing cluster of earthquakes and investigate possible causes.
Funder
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Publisher
Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists
Reference33 articles.
1. Alt, R.C. and Zoback, M.D., 2016, In situ stress and active faulting in Oklahoma. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 107, p. 216-228 2. Bankey, V., Cuevas, A., Daniels, D., Finn, C.A., Hernandez, I., Hill, P., Kucks, R., Miles,W., Pilkington, M., Roberts, C., Roest, W., Rystron, V., Shearer, S., Snyder, S., Sweeney, R., Velez, J., Philips, J.D., and Ravat, D., 2002, Digital data grids for the magnetic anomaly map of North America: U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-414. 3. Burberry, C.M., Swiatlowski, J.L., Searls, M.L., and Filina, I., 2018, Joint and lineament patterns across the midcontinent indicate repeated reactivation of basement-involved faults: Geosciences, v. 8, p. 215. 4. Burberry, C.M., Joeckel, R.M., and Korus, J.T., 2015, Post-Mississippian tectonic evolution of the Nemaha Tectonic Zone and Midcontinent Rift System, SE Nebraska and N Kansas: The Mountain Geologist, v. 52, p. 47-73. 5. Burchett, R., Luza, K., Van Eck, O., and Wilson, F., 1985, Seismicity and tectonic relationship of the Nemaha uplift and Midcontinent geophysical anomaly: Special publication 85-2, Oklahoma Geological Survey, 37 p.
|
|