The aim of education as an object of socio-philosophical research

Author:

Rakhinsky D. V.1,Panasenko G. V.2,Mineev V. V.3,Shtumpf S. P.3,Mikhailichenko A. G.4

Affiliation:

1. Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University; Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University; Siberian Federal University

2. Siberian Federal University

3. Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafyev

4. Krasnoyarsk Regional Center for Education of Medical Professional

Abstract

Introduction. The research presented in the article is aimed at identifying the most significant aspects of the problems of educational aims. The existing ways of understanding the aims of education are considered, and conclusions are drawn regarding their distinctive features. The connection between the problems of the aim of education and other aspects of the philosophical reflection of education is shown – questions of the definition of education and criteria for assessing educational results. Purpose setting. The research sets the task of generalizing modern socio-philosophical ideas about the aim of education. The authors adhere to the position that the emergence, change, and functioning of educational aims are primarily determined by social factors. Methodology and methods of the study. In the course of the study, methods of substantive and comparative analysis of domestic and foreign literature devoted to the problems of educational aims were used. Results. Significant milestones in the development of understanding the problems of the aim of education in a socio-philosophical key are highlighted. The content of the normative approach to understanding the aim of education, developed by R.S. Peters, is considered, as well as the connection between his concept of the aim of education and the understanding of education as initiation. The innovations of the functionalist approach to understanding the aim of education are analyzed. The importance of distinguishing between the types of aims that appear in the educational context is shown. Some of the positions concerning the conditioning of educational aims by the influence of other social institutions – political, economic – are reproduced. Conclusion. The authors are inclined to the idea of the multidimensionality of the aim of education, its complexity. They emphasize the limitations of binary classifications of educational aims. The analysis carried out allows us to conclude that the question of the aim of education is one of the priorities for the socio-philosophical comprehension of educational reality.

Publisher

State Public Scientific Technological Library SB RAS

Reference25 articles.

1. Gurevich P. S. Philosophy of education: theory and practice. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2006, no. 4, pp. 31 – 38. (In Russ.).

2. Shurukhina T. N. New philosophy of education: an attempt to comprehend pedagogical reality. Pedagogika. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2016, no. 2, pp. 48 – 50. (In Russ.).

3. Retyunskikh L. T. Education as thinking, or The role of philosophy in the educational system. Filosofskie nauki, 2023, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 24 – 50. (In Russ.).

4. Rozin V. M. Philosophy of education: etudes-studies. Moscow, Izd-vo Mosk. psikhol.-sots. in-ta, 2007, 576 p. (In Russ.).

5. Semechko E. E. Philosophy of education: initial concepts and problems. Vestnik evraziiskoi nauki, 2015, no. 2, pp. 1 – 10. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3