Scientific Library Between Open and Corporate Science

Author:

Rykhtorova A. E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The concept of Open science comes into conflict with the established practice of commercializing the results of research and development work. Commercialization of scientific achievements is both a way to attract funding and a deterrent to intensify the exchange of knowledge and the pace of innovation, especially in basic research. The principles of Open science, providing the ability to widely use and reuse the same data, comparing different approaches and accelerating the development of new research methods, make patenting applied developments much more difficult due to leveling the novelty of inventions in publications and open research data. The purpose of the article is to suggest the possibilities for scientific library to participate in the processes of production, exchange and dissemination of information and knowledge within the framework of the movement of science from the binary system “corporate science vs open science” to hybrid mechanisms of work. Such participation is based on the existing practices of the Centers for Legal and Technical Information and the efforts of scientific library to create an open scientific infrastructure. It involves the expansion of ongoing practices, taking into account the proposed by hybrid science differentiation of Open access to fundamental research and patenting applied developments. Thus, these opportunities are necessary for further modeling the place of scientific library in the ecosystem of open science.

Publisher

State Public Scientific Technological Library SB RAS

Subject

General Medicine

Reference24 articles.

1. Antipin V. (2020) On the role of the institute of intellectual property as a mechanism for introducing scientific achievements into production. Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Promyshlennaya sobstvennost'. 3: 5-12 (In Russ.)

2. Belikova K. (2019) Intellectual rights, information and scientific information in the focus of the economics of law. Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Promyshlennaya sobstvennost'. 5: 23-31 (In Russ.)

3. Bochkova I. N. (2013) TISC activities at PNU: Significance for Russia's innovative economy. Modern trends in the development of library and information technologies. Materialy pyatoi Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyashch. 55-letiyu Tikhookean. gos. un-ta. 23—26 sent. 2013 g. Khabarovsk. Khabarovsk : Izd-vo TOGU. 110-115. (In Russ.)

4. Volkova K. YU., Shraiberg YA. L. (2020) Analysis of trends in the development of modern library and information infrastructure in the context of the ongoing pandemic. (Review of materials of foreign professional publications). (Part 1). Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 10: 15-36 (In Russ.)

5. Volkova T. I., Usol'tsev I. A. Intellectual products of the scientific sphere: the potential for commercialization. Ekaterinburg: Institut ehkonomiki URO RAN, 171. (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3