Attitude to innovations and the stress of innovations in higher education

Author:

Tashcheva A. I.1ORCID,Arpentieva M. R.2ORCID,Gridneva S. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. South Federal University

2. Center for Psychological, Pedagogical, Medical and Social Assistance “Sodejstvie”

Abstract

This article focuses on the attitude to innovations and the stress of innovations in higher education. Numerous researchers identify different types of learning (teaching) focused on more or less innovativeness, including more or less procedural, methodological, etc. creation. Thus, the traditional, reproductive and “theoretically oriented” type of education is associated with the retransmission, reproduction of social experience, the second, “practically oriented” – with a creative search based on the existing experience and thus with its enrichment. However, in reality it is impossible to find such forms and formats of teaching and upbringing, in which the practice of teaching was reduced only to the organization of pure reproduction of knowledge and skills, it is even more unrealistic to imagine teaching on an exclusively creative, practical, research, meta-subject basis beyond the reproductive retransmission of the most important knowledge and skills left by the predecessors to the living generations. We are usually talking about the quality and focus of education, its moral, ideological, social, psychological and other conditions and results. The authors discuss the concept of the stress of innovations. The stress of innovations in educational institutions is the stress that occurs in the process and as a result of the introduction of innovations in education. The innovations cause a situation that gives rise to stress and post-stress disorders in students and teachers (didactogenies in the forms of pediogeny, mathetogeny, eductogeny). The main goal of the study is to comprehend the types of people’s attitudes towards innovations in education in the context of the concept of innovation stress. The main method of this research was a theoretical analysis of the problematics of people’s attitudes to innovation in education in the context of the concept of innovation stress. All productive and effective innovations in education are connected by one idea – the creation of conditions under which the development of a person as a person, partner and student/professional is inevitable, and not just stated or impossible. When developing an integrative model for the prevention and overcoming of the stresses of innovation for students and teachers (in case of mathetogeny, pediogeny and eductogeny) it is important to set and solve the tasks of prevention and correction of stress in the context of the development of subjects of education in different contexts: in the context of educational, professional, personal and interactive development. Prevention and correction of stress in innovative education (and in the stress from innovation) is associated with the prevention and correction of pediogenies (harm caused by the wrong, destructive and pathological attitude of teachers to students), mathetogenies (harm caused by the wrong, destructive and pathological attitude of students to teachers), and eductogenies (harm associated with the deformation of organizational conditions and forms of training and education). One of the components of the work is psychological (psychotherapeutic) assistance to the subjects of education (in the form of one-time consultations and trainings, coaching and systematic support). Such assistance, even in the form of one-time consultations, should nevertheless be aimed at systematic, integrative prevention and correction of stresses in education, including the stresses of innovation.

Publisher

State Public Scientific Technological Library SB RAS

Subject

General Engineering

Reference43 articles.

1. Naumtseva Yu. Psychological readiness for organizational change: approaches, concepts, methods. Organizational Psychology, 2016, vol. 6, no 2, pp. 55–74 (In Russ.).

2. Panferov V.N., Bezgodova S.A., Vasil’eva S.V., IvanovA.S., Miklyaeva A.V. Learning efficiency and academic motivation of students in online interaction with a teacher (using the example of a video lecture). Social Psychology and Society, 2020, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 127–143. DOI:10.17759/sps.2020110108. (In Russ.).

3. Baudrillard J. Simulacra and simulations. Moscow, POSTUM, 2015, 240 p. (In Russ.).

4. Kirik V.А., Tashcheva A.I., Gridneva S.V. [et al.] (project coordinators). Academy of psychology and pedagogy: educational opportunities for practice-oriented learning : handbook. Rostovon-Don, Southern Federal University, 2017, 88 p. (In Russ.).

5. Tashcheva A. I., Gridneva S. V. Psychological service at the university: organizational, ethical and methodological problems. Psychological service of the university: reality and prospects : proc. of I All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. with intern. participation, Moscow, October 27–28, 2017. Moscow, 2017, pp. 36–44. (In Russ.).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3