Performance of AI-Based Phase Picking and Event Association Methods after the Large 2023 Mw 7.8 and 7.6 Türkiye Doublet

Author:

Becker Dirk1ORCID,McBrearty Ian W.2ORCID,Beroza Gregory C.2ORCID,Martínez-Garzón Patricia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany

2. 2Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A.

Abstract

ABSTRACT On 6 February 2023, a devastating earthquake doublet consisting of Mw 7.8 and 7.6 events separated by about 9 hr struck the southeastern part of Türkiye. The developing aftershock sequence contained thousands of events during the first few days and overwhelmed the routine algorithms handling their detection and location. In addition, several stations temporarily lost real-time contact and came online again later. At the same time the Omori decay of the aftershock event rate reduced the event frequency and allowed for inclusion of progressively smaller-magnitude events with time. One possibility to help deal with such a complex situation is the use of machine learning (ML) methods to generate earthquake catalogs with a substantially higher number of events. Here, we present high-resolution earthquake catalogs derived with two ML association methods for the first five days of the aftershock sequence of this doublet. In terms of the number of reliably located events, the event catalog created from PhaseNet picks and the GENIE phase association method outperforms both the routine regional catalog and the second ML-derived catalog obtained from the GaMMA phase association method. Although both GaMMA and GENIE catalogs detect about 6 times more events than the routine catalog, GENIE associates on average about double the phases to a single event than GaMMA, which results in better constrained event locations. The spatiotemporal evolution of the event rates is sensitive to changes in the network geometry due to variable station availability. During the first few days, no decay of the event rate in the enhanced catalog is observed due to the inclusion of progressively smaller-magnitude events with time and increased station availability. This study indicates that ML-derived earthquake catalogs for challenging time periods like the early aftershock sequences of large earthquakes have the potential to significantly improve routine event catalogs.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Reference67 articles.

1. AFAD (Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency) earthquake catalog;AFAD,2023

2. Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks;Battaglia,2018

3. Machine learning based aftershock catalogs of the Mw 7.8, February 6th, 2023, Karamanmaras earthquake;Becker,2024

4. Analysis of microseismicity framing ML>2.5 earthquakes at The Geysers geothermal field, California;Bentz;J. Geophys. Res.,2019

5. Machine learning and earthquake forecasting—Next steps;Beroza;Nat. Commun.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3