The Community Stress-Drop Validation Study—Part II: Uncertainties of the Source Parameters and Stress Drop Analysis

Author:

Bindi Dino1ORCID,Spallarossa Daniele2ORCID,Picozzi Matteo3ORCID,Oth Adrien4ORCID,Morasca Paola5ORCID,Mayeda Kevin6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1German Research Centre for Geoscience GFZ, Potsdam, Germany

2. 2Department for Earth, Environment, and Life Sciences DISTAV, University of Genova, Genova, Italy

3. 3Department of Physics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

4. 4European Center for Geodynamics and Seismology, Walferdange, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

5. 5National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology INGV, Milan, Italy

6. 6Air Force Technical Applications Center AFTAC, Florida, U.S.A.

Abstract

Abstract As part of the community stress-drop validation study, we evaluate the uncertainties of seismic moment M0 and corner frequency fc for earthquakes of the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence. Source spectra were obtained in the companion article by applying the spectral decomposition approach with alternative processing and model assumptions. The objective of the present study is twofold: first, to quantify the impact of different assumptions on the source parameters; and second, to use the distribution of values obtained with different assumptions to estimate an epistemic contribution to the uncertainties. Regarding the first objective, we find that the choice of the attenuation model has a strong impact on fc results: by introducing a depth-dependent attenuation model, fc estimates of events shallower than 6 km increase of about 10%. Also, the duration of the window used to compute the Fourier spectra show an impact on fc: the average ratio between the estimates for 20 s duration to those for 5 s decreases from 1.1 for Mw<3 to 0.66 for Mw>4.5. For the second objective, we use a mixed-effect regression to partition the intraevent variability into duration, propagation, and site contributions. The standard deviation ϕ of the intraevent residuals for log(fc) is 0.0635, corresponding to a corner frequency ratio 102ϕ=1.33. When the intraevent variability is compared to uncertainties on log(fc), we observe that 2ϕ is generally larger than the 95% confidence interval of log(fc), suggesting that the uncertainty of the source parameters provided by the fitting procedure might underestimate the model-related (epistemic) uncertainty. Finally, although we observe an increase of log(Δσ) with log(M0) regardless of the model assumptions, the increase of Δσ with depth depends on the assumptions, and no significant trends are detected when depth-dependent attenuation and velocity values are considered.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Subject

Geophysics

Reference34 articles.

1. Resolution and uncertainties in estimates of earthquake stress drop and energy release;Abercrombie;Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A,2021

2. Does earthquake stress drop increase with depth in the crust?;Abercrombie;J. Geophys. Res.,2021

3. Objective determination of source parameters and similarity of earthquakes of different size;Andrews,1986

4. The variability of ground-motion prediction models and its components;Atik;Seismol. Res. Lett.,2010

5. A community stress drop validation study using the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake dataset;Baltay,2021

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3