Shallow Faulting and Folding in the Epicentral Area of the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake

Author:

Pratt Thomas L.1ORCID,Shah Anjana K.2ORCID,Counts Ronald C.3ORCID,Horton J. Wright1ORCID,Chapman Martin C.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, U.S.A.

2. 2U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.

3. 3University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, U.S.A.

4. 4Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The moment magnitude (Mw) ∼7 earthquake that struck Charleston, South Carolina, on 31 August 1886 is the largest historical earthquake in the United States east of the Appalachian Mountains. The fault(s) that ruptured during this earthquake has never been conclusively identified, and conflicting fault models have been proposed. Here we interpret reprocessed seismic reflection profiles, reprocessed legacy aeromagnetic data, and newly collected ground penetrating radar (GPR) profiles to delineate faults deforming the Cretaceous and younger Atlantic Coastal Plain (ACP) strata in the epicentral area of the 1886 earthquake. The data show evidence for faults folding or vertically displacing ACP strata, including apparent displacements of near-surface strata (upper ∼20 m). Aeromagnetic data show several northeast (NE)-trending lineaments, two of which correlate with faults and folds with vertical displacements as great as 55 m on the seismic reflection and radar profiles. ACP strata show only minor thickness changes across these structures, indicating that much of the displacement postdates the shallowest well-imaged ACP strata of Eocene age. Faults imaged on the seismic reflection profiles appear on GPR profiles to displace the erosional surface at the top of the upper Eocene to Oligocene Cooper Group, including where railroad tracks were bent during the 1886 earthquake. Some faults coincide with changes in river trends, bifurcations of river channels, and unusual river meanders that could be related to recent fault motion. In contrast to our interpreted NE fault trends, earthquake locations and some focal mechanisms in the modern seismic zone have been interpreted as defining a nearly north-striking, west-dipping zone of aftershocks from the 1886 earthquake. The relationship between the modern seismicity and the faults we image is therefore enigmatic. However, multiple faults in the area clearly have been active since the Eocene and deform strata in the upper 20 m, providing potential targets for field-based geologic investigations.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Reference84 articles.

1. Seismic-refraction study in the area of the Charleston, South Carolina, 1886 earthquake;Ackermann,1983

2. The search for evidence of large prehistoric earthquakes along the Atlantic seaboard;Amick;Science,1991

3. Magnitudes and locations of the 1811–1812 New Madrid Missouri and the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake;Bakun;Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,2004

4. Northern ancestry for the Goochland Terrane as a displaced fragment of Laurentia;Bartholomew;Geology,2004

5. Did movement on a northwest trending listric fault near the southeast edge of the Jedburg Triassic–Jurassic (?) basin cause the Charleston, South Carolina, 1886 earthquake?;Behrendt,1983

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3