Performance of Deep Learning Pickers in Routine Network Processing Applications

Author:

García José Enrique1ORCID,Fernández-Prieto Luis M.2ORCID,Villaseñor Antonio2ORCID,Sanz Verónica134ORCID,Ammirati Jean-Baptiste5ORCID,Díaz Suárez Eduardo A.6ORCID,García Carmen1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC), CSIC-Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain

2. 2Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM), CSIC, Barcelona, Spain

3. 3Departament de Fisica Teorica and IFIC, Universitat de Valencia-CSIC, Burjassot, Spain

4. 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom

5. 5Departamento de Geología, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

6. 6Centro Geofísico de Canarias, Instituto Geográfico Nacional, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

Abstract

Abstract Picking arrival times of P and S phases is a fundamental and time-consuming task for the routine processing of seismic data acquired by permanent and temporary networks. A large number of automatic pickers have been developed, but to perform well they often require the tuning of multiple parameters to adapt them to each dataset. Despite the great advance in techniques, some problems remain, such as the difficulty to accurately pick S waves and earthquake recordings with a low signal-to-noise ratio. Recently, phase pickers based on deep learning (DL) have shown great potential for event identification and arrival-time picking. However, the general adoption of these methods for the routine processing of monitoring networks has been held back by factors such as the availability of well-documented software, computational resources, and a gap in knowledge of these methods. In this study, we evaluate recent available DL pickers for earthquake data, comparing the performance of several neural network architectures. We test the selected pickers using three datasets with different characteristics. We found that the analyzed DL pickers (generalized phase detection, PhaseNet, and EQTransformer) perform well in the three tested cases. They are very efficient at ignoring large-amplitude transient noise and at picking S waves, a task that is often difficult even for experienced analysts. Nevertheless, the performance of the analyzed DL pickers varies widely in terms of sensitivity and false discovery rate, with some pickers missing a significant percentage of true picks and others producing a large number of false positives. There are also variations in run time between DL pickers, with some of them requiring significant resources to process large datasets. In spite of these drawbacks, we show that DL pickers can be used efficiently to process large seismic datasets and obtain results comparable or better than current standard procedures.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Subject

Geophysics

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3