The Ojai California Earthquake of 20 August 2023: Earthquake Early Warning Performance and Alert Recipient Response in the Mw 5.1 Event

Author:

Goltz James D.1ORCID,Wald David J.2ORCID,McBride Sara K.3,Reddy Elizabeth4ORCID,Quitoriano Vincent2ORCID,Saunders Jessie K.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.

2. 2U.S. Geological Survey, Golden, Colorado, U.S.A.

3. 3U.S. Geological Survey, Moffett Field, California, U.S.A.

4. 4Colorado School of Mines, General Research Lab, Golden, Colorado, U.S.A.

5. 5California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, U.S.A.

Abstract

Abstract A magnitude 5.1 earthquake in California rarely generates more than momentary notice—a headline in local newspapers and a mention with footage on the evening news—then fades into obscurity for most people. But this earthquake, which occurred near the city of Ojai, is important for seismologists, social scientists, emergency managers, policymakers, and others who are engaged in implementing and improving earthquake early warning (EEW) technology and in assessing its value in public warnings. In this earthquake, ShakeAlert, the EEW system for the West Coast of the United States operated by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), was publicly activated and, for the first time, a substantial number of those who received alerts provided feedback on various aspects of the alerts they received. To capture data related to public attitudes and assessments regarding this and future alerts, a supplemental questionnaire was developed and associated with the “Did You Feel It?” (DYFI) earthquake reporting system, also operated by the USGS. The DYFI system received over 14,000 felt reports; 2490 of these were by people who received or expected to receive an alert before the onset of earthquake motion at their locations. This article analyzes the aggregate results of these EEW user reports, touching on the respondent’s situation upon receiving the alert, characteristics of the alert received, and, perhaps, most importantly, how the alert recipient responded if received before feeling earthquake motion. The new DYFI EEW supplemental questionnaire also inquired about respondent views of alert usefulness and preferences in future alerts. Our report provides a first glimpse of a range of behaviors, attitudes, and assessments by users of the recently implemented EEW system for the U.S. West Coast.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Reference61 articles.

1. Behavior during earthquakes: A southern Italian example;Alexander;Int. J. Mass. Emerg. Disasters,1990

2. The behavior of people in dwellings during the off-Urakawa earthquake of 21 March 1982;Archea;Disasters,1983

3. Evaluación de la alerta sísmica para la ciudad de México desde una perspectiva sociológica: Resultados en poblaciones escolares con y sin alerta;Arjonilla,1998

4. Occupant behavior in a six-story office building following severe earthquake damage;Arnold;Disasters,1982

5. Scoping the potential for earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand: A sectoral analysis of perceived benefits and challenges;Becker;Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3