Empirical Distance Metrics Relationships and Uncertainties in Seismic Hazard Assessment

Author:

Kayastha Melish1,Pezeshk Shahram1ORCID,Tavakoli Behrooz2

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A.

2. 2Department of Seismology and Geophysics, G&HES, Bechtel Power Corporation, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe seismic hazard of an area is determined based on the ground motion observed at that site. The intensity of the ground motion can be predicted using ground -motion models (GMMs). GMMs typically use distance metrics such as the Joyner–Boore distance (RJB) and the rupture distance (RRUP). However, apart from RJB and RRUP, probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) also utilizes point-source-based distances like the epicentral distance (REPI) and the hypocentral distance (RHYP). These distance metrics are used for point sources when the fault geometry is unknown or is ignored. To obtain an accurate seismic hazard of an area, we need to determine the relationship between the distance metrics. In this study, we develop empirical relationships between RJB and various other distance metrics. This method avoids conducting computationally intensive tasks such as computing finite-fault-based distances for different fault geometry of a virtual rupture plane for each point source. The empirical equations provide the relation between RJB and target distance metric (Rtarget) based on the magnitude of the earthquake and the dip angle of the fault. In addition, we also require the depth to the top of the rupture to calculate RHYP. We discuss the steps to include the variability due to the conversion of the distance metrics in the PSHA. We have compared the results of this study with other published studies for distance conversion. A simple PSHA study of a circular area of 100 km using Pezeshk et al. (2011) as the GMM determined an increase in hazard using the proposed empirical equations and their uncertainties. The equations developed in this study can be directly applied in PSHA and are independent of the GMMs used for seismic hazard calculations. The equations can also be used for different fault geometries with a range of dip angles varying from 10° to 90°, for magnitudes 5.0–8.0, and distances up to 200 km. We have focused on the central and eastern United States.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3