Toward Robust and Routine Determination of Mw for Small Earthquakes: Application to the 2020 Mw 5.7 Magna, Utah, Seismic Sequence

Author:

Holt James1,Whidden Katherine M.1,Koper Keith D.1,Pankow Kristine L.1,Mayeda Kevin2,Pechmann James C.1,Edwards Benjamin3,Gök Rengin4,Walter William R.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.

2. Air Force Technical Applications Center, Patrick Air Force Base, Florida, U.S.A.

3. Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

4. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.S.A.

Abstract

Abstract To better characterize seismic hazard, particularly, for induced seismicity, there is an increasing interest in methods to estimate moment magnitude (Mw) for small earthquakes. Mw is generally preferred over other magnitude types, but, it is difficult to estimate Mw for earthquakes with local magnitude (ML) <3–3.5, using conventional moment tensor (MT) inversion. The 2020 Mww 5.7 Magna, Utah, seismic sequence provides an opportunity to illustrate and evaluate the value of spectral methods for this purpose. Starting with a high-quality seismic catalog of 2103 earthquakes (ML<5.6), we estimate Mw using two independent spectral methods—one based on direct waves, yielding Mw,direct, and the other based on coda waves, yielding Mw,coda. For the direct-wave method, we present a non-parametric (NP) inversion scheme that solves for apparent geometrical spreading, G(R), and site effects (S), similar to other NP procedures that have been used to calibrate regional ML scales. The NP inversion is constrained using Mws derived from MTs for nine events in the Magna sequence. We recover statistically robust and physically reasonable G(R) and S and compute Mw,direct for 635 Magna earthquakes down to ML 0.7. For the coda-wave method, we consider two separate calibration schemes involving previous MT solutions and compute Mw,coda for 311 earthquakes down to ML 1.0. For 280 of the events that were processed with both methods—Mw,direct and Mw,coda—are strongly correlated (r = 0.98), with a mean difference of only 0.05. We compare Mw,direct and Mw,coda with ML and find reasonably good agreement for ML<3.6 with the theoretically predicted relationship of Mw=(2/3)ML+C, in which C is a regional constant. Our results imply that seismic network operators can use spectral-based Mw estimates to replace ML estimates for events with ML≥1.0, and possibly smaller. The main requirement is the existence of a small number of MT solutions for calibration purposes.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Subject

Geophysics

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3