Can We Trust High-Frequency Content in Strong-Motion Database Signals? Impact of Housing, Coupling, and Installation Depth of Seismic Sensors

Author:

Hollender Fabrice12,Roumelioti Zafeiria3,Maufroy Emeline2,Traversa Paola4,Mariscal Armand25

Affiliation:

1. French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), DES, CEA Cadarache, DCET/SESN, Saint Paul Lez Durance, France

2. Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IRD, IFSTTAR, ISTerre, Grenoble, France

3. Department of Geology, University of Patras, Rio Patras, Greece

4. EDF, DIPNN-DI-TEGG, Aix-en-Provence, France

5. Now at Université Grenoble Alpes, IRD, CNRS, Grenoble INP, IGE, Grenoble, France

Abstract

Abstract Seismic hazard studies provide indicators of seismic motion that are expressed for “free-field,” that is, representative of the ground motion exactly at the free surface, without disturbances due to interactions between soil and buildings or other structures. Most of these studies are based on ground-motion prediction equations, which are, themselves, formulated to predict free-field motion, as they are derived from similarly free data. However, is this really the case? In this study, we use several examples to illustrate how small structures hosting permanent strong-motion stations (often anchored on small concrete slabs) generate soil–structure interaction effects that can amplify the high-frequency part of the earthquake signal (>10  Hz) by up to a factor of 2–3 for stations on soils. We also show that the installation depth of a station, even if very shallow (i.e., a few meters), can change the recorded response, mainly by deamplifying the signal in high frequencies (>10  Hz) by a factor up to 0.3. Such effects imply that there are actual differences between recorded and true free-field signals. Depending on the housing conditions, these effects can have significant impact on response spectra at high frequencies, and on measurements of the κ parameter. It is, thus, becoming clear that such effects should be taken into account in studies involving high-frequency seismic motion. To do so, scientists need a detailed description of the conditions of installation and housing of seismological and accelerometric stations, which often lacks from the metadata distributed through the various, commonly used web services. Increasing such information and facilitating the access to it would allow the identification of stations that are problematic and of those that are truly close to free-field recording conditions. In a subsequent step, it would be important to quantify the modification curve of the response of stations that experience such effects.

Publisher

Seismological Society of America (SSA)

Subject

Geophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3