Affiliation:
1. 1Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, U.S.A.
2. 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
3. 3U.S. Geological Survey, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
Abstract
Abstract
The 2023 Turkey earthquake sequence involved unexpected ruptures across numerous fault segments. We present 3D dynamic rupture simulations to illuminate the complex dynamics of the earthquake doublet. Our models are constrained by observations available within days of the sequence and deliver timely, mechanically consistent explanations of the unforeseen rupture paths, diverse rupture speeds, multiple slip episodes, heterogeneous fault offsets, locally strong shaking, and fault system interactions. Our simulations link both earthquakes, matching geodetic and seismic observations and reconciling regional seismotectonics, rupture dynamics, and ground motions of a fault system represented by 10 curved dipping segments and embedded in a heterogeneous stress field. The Mw 7.8 earthquake features delayed backward branching from a steeply branching splay fault, not requiring supershear speeds. The asymmetrical dynamics of the distinct, bilateral Mw 7.7 earthquake are explained by heterogeneous fault strength, prestress orientation, fracture energy, and static stress changes from the previous earthquake. Our models explain the northward deviation of its eastern rupture and the minimal slip observed on the Sürgü fault. 3D dynamic rupture scenarios can elucidate unexpected observations shortly after major earthquakes, providing timely insights for data-driven analysis and hazard assessment toward a comprehensive, physically consistent understanding of the mechanics of multifault systems.
Publisher
Seismological Society of America (SSA)
Subject
General Chemical Engineering
Reference37 articles.
1. Rupture propagation with finite stress in antiplane strain;Andrews;J. Geophys. Res.,1976
2. Connecting subduction, extension and shear localization across the Aegean Sea and Anatolia;Barbot;Geophys. J. Int.,2021
3. Slip distribution of the February 6, 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey earthquake sequence in the East Anatolian Fault Zone;Barbot;Seismica,2023
4. A grand challenge international infrastructure for earthquake science;Ben-Zion;Seismol. Res. Lett.,2022
5. Arrest of the Mw 6.8 January 24, 2020 Elaziğ (Turkey) earthquake by shallow fault creep;Cakir;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.,2023
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献